My frenemy; or, Chanel the corpse flower

Amorphophallus_titanum_-_Botanischer_Garten_der_Universität_Basel_07Oh, Chanel, you were such a tease. Maybe I should have figured that out from your fancy name, or from your Facebook page. When I look back, it’s not that you posted anything actually untrue, but you did get me all excited about your debut, your flowering, your signature scent. You were constantly updating the hours you were available; there was even a webcam to show what you were up to every five minutes. Looking back, it any wonder how worked up I was about finally having the chance to meet you?

But then: the Facebook page. I should have known from just that. How many plants have a social media presence? Continue reading

Conversation with Dan Vergano: the Science Ghetto

shutterstock_11125360Ann:  In the last year or more or so, science writers have had Twitterfights with a culture/media writer, a nonfiction writer, and a script writer.   After the latest fight another science writer, the wise and civilized Dan Vergano of USA Today, Twitter-messaged me that he wished these fights would stop because they reinforced the walls around the science ghetto.  “GUEST POST!” I said.  “I’d rather make it a conversation,” he said.  So, Dan:  I never heard of the science ghetto.  Does that mean I’m so far inside it I didn’t know it had an outside?

Dan:   Ann is making a funny with her question. Her book, The Jasons: The Secret History of Science’s Postwar Elite is exactly the kind of look at the real-world intersection of science and militarism that I think matters more than one more story about a snub-nosed dinosaur.

Ann:  Oh well then. In that case, I completely see the force and rationale in your argument.  No — vanity aside for one second — really, I still don’t know what the science ghetto is.  And what’s the problem with stories about snub-nosed dinosaurs?

Dan:  The idea, and it comes from the redoubtable Tom Hayden, is that science reporting has largely become a secret garden walled off, and walling itself off, from the rest of the world.  Instead of reporting on the scientific aspects of news stories — whether Iran really will have the bomb, whether Quantitative Easing will spark inflation, whether Peak Oil is a real concern — we write pretty entertainments about mummies, exploding stars and the sex life of ducks. All that stuff is great, but it is a news diet of ice cream and cookies without any sirloin. And it has contributed to the trade being regarded as a low-prestige, low-value part of news. Continue reading

I hate climbing, but love having climbed

2013-07-27 12.59.52TREE3I was about 50 feet up when I started to freak out. I had agreed to come to this Oregon forest and climb a very tall, very old tree with my mom, because it seemed like a nice mother-daughter bonding experience. Now I was approximately one-fifth of the way up a Douglas fir named Sophia, and all I could think about was her nickname, “the Meltdown Tree.”

As he’d helped us suit up with harnesses and helmets, Jason Seppa, our friendly and very patient guide, had chuckled a little as he recounted how the tree had acquired this sobriquet after a particularly trying outing with some other clients. His unspoken assumption was that neither Mom nor me was in danger of melting down. I wanted to prove him right. Continue reading

The macabre habits of the butcher bird

Dead lizardThe remains of a horned lizard killed by a shrike.

Wandering around New York’s American Museum of Natural History one day in May, I noticed a bird called the fiscal shrike. The small stuffed specimen, black with dashes of white on its wings, was perched on a shrub in a diorama of Kenya’s Kedong Valley. What an awful name for a bird, I thought. It sounded like a new budget-cutting initiative, or a particularly dire stage of an economic meltdown.

It turns out that “fiscal shrike” is not the worst thing this bird has been called*. One of its nicknames is “jacky hangman”; its genus, Lanius, is also called “butcher bird.” Germans have dubbed a related shrike species “Neuntöter,” meaning “murderer with nine victims.” Continue reading

Guest Post: Me vs Myers-Briggs

robinneice“Can you talk to a stranger for an hour?”

Despite coming from a computer, the question felt almost aggressive.  Of course I can talk to a stranger for an hour.  I was a reporter for over a decade; you can’t do that job without learning to talk to almost anyone for an hour.

Still, I wanted to say no. Just like I’d wanted to say no to several other questions the computer had just posed, even though the true answers were all yeses. It was the night before a school-sponsored Myers-Briggs personality workshop, and I was taking the famous test for the first time.  And I was starting to think it was rigged. Every time I admitted that I could make small talk or navigate a party, I knew I was edging one step closer to being labeled an extrovert.  Continue reading

The Last Word

shutterstock_14615224722 – 26 July

The “since-you-live-in-Mexico-you’ll-probably-be-dead-tomorrow attitude” is the most frustrating thing about being a Mexican expat, says Erik. The smoky volcanoes? Not so much.

Ann and Abstruse Goose showed us the grave harm that befalls physicists who try too hard to describe reality.

Jessa explored the intriguing new science of awe, and how you can use it to engineer a better quality of life.

Cassie considered the messy realities of end of life decisions.

And Mr. Cosmology returned to answer your burning questions! Some of them even touch briefly on cosmology!

AG: Physicists Are Just Proto-Philosophers

quantum_physics_is_a_liePhysicists do say these things about quantum mechanics — a highly-mathematical description of fundamental reality at the bottom of which is the uncertainty principle in which the act of measuring one piece of reality  screws up other measurements.  The upshot is, the whole of reality isn’t measureable all at once.  The more you think about it, the worse it gets.  At some point, physicists say, the whole discussion starts to sound less like physics than philosophy.

Once I heard a physicist say some quantum thing was “highly theoretical” and since he had an accent, I wasn’t sure I heard him right.

“You didn’t say, ‘highly theological?’ did you?” I said.

“Yes,” he said.

Once I went to a talk by a philosopher of physics and I’m never doing that again.

__________

http://abstrusegoose.com/511

Until the Bitter End

640px-Hospital_bedsLast night I read Robin Marantz Henig’s beautiful story about Peggy Battin, a bioethicist and advocate for patients who wish to end their lives, and her husband, Brooke Hopkins. A bike accident in 2008 left Brooke paralyzed from the shoulders down and in need of almost constant care. Some days Brooke wants to live; other days he wants to die. And that puts Peggy in a difficult position: “Suffering, suicide, euthanasia, a dignified death — these were subjects she had thought and written about for years, and now, suddenly, they turned unbearably personal. Alongside her physically ravaged husband, she would watch lofty ideas be trumped by reality — and would discover just how messy, raw and muddled the end of life can be,” Marantz Henig writes. Still, Brooke has the ability to make a choice and to communicate that choice. Not everyone has that option. The story made me think of an example from my own life that was both simpler and more complex. Continue reading