The mental health paradox

treeIt’s a long-standing mystery in public health: despite the inarguably vast number of psychological and sociological stresses they face in the U.S., African Americans are mentally healthier than white people. The phenomenon is formally described as the “race paradox in mental health”.

The paradox became apparent in the mid-1990s. Since then, an overwhelming majority of research has confirmed lower rates of most major psychiatric disorders, including depression, panic disorder, anxiety, and alcohol dependence. It’s not just an absence of problems: Cory L. M. Keyes of Emory University found that “even when assessed by a subset of the signs of overall (flourishing) mental health or the diagnosis of mental health as a complete state — the absence of mental disorders and the presence of flourishing — Blacks have better mental health than Whites.”

This has invited a lot of speculation. (Let’s quickly dismiss the ideas that African Americans are simply not going to the doctor, or drowning their sorrows in substances. These putative explanations have been thoroughly debunked.) More credible theories tie the improved mental well-being to more supportive family relationships. Or they point to what are called “fictive kin” relationships, a term that refers to the unofficial family structures that develop in communities where people, for one reason or another, choose not to settle into standard nuclear family structures.

But when Dawne Mouzon set out to tease apart whether these factors offered a credible explanation, they came up short. In an investigation published last week, Mouzon — a sociologist who teaches public policy at Rutgers University in New Jersey — dispensed with much of the received wisdom. For example, she writes that “neither the quality nor quality of family relationships can explain the race paradox in mental health.”

Instead, Mouzon concluded that “it is plausible that African Americans possess other resilience mechanisms (e.g., other social relationships, different types of coping strategies) that I was unable to consider here.”

I like that word: resilience. Continue reading

Are Academics a Public Resource?

podiumAs a frequent flyer I have begun to be able to spot those airline passengers who have not yet twigged to the cabin crew’s role. A flight attendant could give you a more accurate figure, but I’d guess roughly a tenth of passengers think the plane is equipped with on-board waiters. A small paradigm shift is required to understand that the core value of a flight attendant is his safety expertise.

I fear I have been part of that ten percent of ingrates in another area: That of university faculty members. Last year I approached a neuroscientist at University College London with some questions about his work and an invitation to speak at a lecture series. His response was borderline hostile. “Do they care about this?” he asked of my audience. When I assured him there was eager interest in his field, he dismissed me and ignored my questions. I’m washing my hair that day, whichever day you pick, was in essence his position. Continue reading

Toe Fungus And Why No One Loves a Science Writer

shutterstock_94123525Have you ever gone to a cocktail party and had a conversation about science? Of course not – nobody goes to cocktail parties anymore. Perhaps a better question would be, have you either gone to a vinyl listening event or underground pop-up restaurant and gotten in a conversation about science?

We’ve all done it. You’re standing there with your Thai/Spanish fusion pork baklava with crème fraîche while listening to obscure Bob Marley B-sides and this person says, “You know what’s really interesting? Toe fungus. Really, it’s just fascinating, I was reading this article…”

Let me stop right there. For the record, toe fungus is not interesting. No one thinks so, probably not even toe fungus experts. What’s happened is a very talented science writer has spun a very tricky tale in which you are carried all the way to the end of a story about freaking toe fungus and are actually glad you read it. Continue reading

What Luis Alvarez Did

640px-Luis_Alvarez_-_Flak_JacketBen:  OK, everyone. Forget Tesla. It’s time to start obsessing about Luis Alvarez.

[That’s Luis Alvarez in the photo, standing in front of the Great Artiste. This post began, as so much in life does, with a Twitter conversation.  Ben Lillie, a physicist and writer, began it; other people added to it.  One of those people was Hope Jahren, who is a biogeochemical paleontologist or something, and her additions took the whole thing right out of the realm of Twitter and into the Land of the Blog Post.]

Ann:  Oh, I’ve heard of Luis Alvarez.  He was a famous physicist.  And he and his son, Walter, did something important about dinosaurs but I forget what. Whatever it was, I think they did it later on.

Ben:  Right. This even starts out crazy. For his graduate work, Alvarez helped discover that cosmic rays are partly made of antimatter. I still meet (well, tweet) people who think anti-matter is fiction. But no, it was found in 1932. Today it’s so common we use it for medical procedures (such as PET scans). Later he also used cosmic ray muons to search for hidden chambers in the pyramids at Giza.

Ann:  During the second World War, he invented the aircraft blind-landing system.  And according to another Alvarez-enthusiast, @andrewtlloyd, while Alvarez was working on the landing system, he met Arthur C. Clarke and Clarke based his novel “Glide Path” on him.

Ben:  OK, and then it turns out that Luis Alvarez was flying in formation with the Enola Gay when it dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima.  And @andrewtlloyd said that the name of the plane Alvarez was on was Great Artiste, and that during the next bombing run, on Nagasaki, he dropped this letter to Japanese scientists. !!

Ann:  And after the war, he and Edward Teller pushed for the next biggest bomb — the H bomb, the Super — that nobody else wanted.

 Ben:  Oh, I forgot the part where Alvarez won the Nobel Prize for *improving* the design for the Bubble Chamber. This guy personified Steampunk — tinkering at this and that and making amazing things. Also, bombs and evil stuff.

Ann:  @andrewtlloyd wrote that his father worked for Alvarez at the Lawrence Berkeley lab, building bubble chambers and then in 1962, Alvarez went to Vietnam to work on the starlight scope, and his attache was Daniel Ellsberg, of the Pentagon Papers.  The starlight scope was basically night vision binoculars, and Alvarez convinced the army it might be a good idea for fighting insurgents at night.

Ben:   ?!??!?! Damn, it just keeps going.

Ann:  Also during the Vietnam War, he invented a chemical sensor called a people-sniffer that could tell the difference between a Vietnamese and an American soldier.  I didn’t actually believe that when I heard it and though my sources were good, I’m not sure I believe it now.

Ben:  Oh, I also forgot the part where he analyzed the footage of the Kennedy Assassination. OF COURSE HE DID  How is this guy not a legend?

Ann:  He liked high-powered secret elite club groups.  He was a member of Jason and of the Bohemian Club.  He probably did some real good for the country as a Jason but the Bohemian Club, as far as I can tell, is of use only to its members.

Hope:  He also said crazy mean shit to the NYT about paleontologists not being real scientists.  The paleo-field is still licking its wounds over that one.

Ben & Ann:  What?  No.  Tell us more. Continue reading

The Last Word

IMG_08174- 8 November

This week, Cassie started losing toenails.

Helen pointed out that women have gone into space for decades. Can they finally start being women?

Cameron enumerated the measurable health effects of Open Streets days have — plus unicycles. And conference bikes.

Ever wonder where the fear of bugs comes from? No one better to tackle the phenomenon than an entomologist, says Michelle. Especially one with a fear of bugs.

For a military physician at Guantanamo Bay, which loyalty wins, Christie wanted to know: Medical ethics or military code?

 

Mapping the Infested Mind

2133554956_0fb5b5b710_zFear of insects is so common that it’s hardly worth remarking on. It’s those of us who don’t fear bugs who can seem a little odd.

Science and nature illustrator Maayan Harel told us recently that while she’s acquired an appreciative fascination with her insect subjects, acquaintances still ask, with a shudder of disgust: “Are you still drawing those bugs?”

Actually eating bugs (and then flossing their bristly little legs out of one’s teeth, as Sally did not long ago) is usually seen as either a courageous, taboo-busting act or just nuts.

And we accommodate entomophobia as a matter of course. Rebecca Boyle, who writes the Eek Squad blog for Popular Science, recently added what she calls a “hide-gross-bug” button to her posts so that squeamish readers can avoid disturbing photos like the one above (sorry). Fears of heights and needles are also extremely common, but we don’t provide a “hide-scary-view” button in skyscrapers, and we’re all still expected to bare our arms for puncturing.

Entomophobia, in fact, is only remarkable when the sufferer is an entomologist.

Continue reading

Toenails Optional

IMG_0817On Sunday I ran 26.2 miles through the streets of New York City. I giggled deliriously as I crossed the finish line. And then I held my medal aloft and beamed for the cameras. But long-distance running isn’t all glamour and glory. There’s a price to be paid, and I’m not talking about the entrance fee. Marathoners pay this toll in toenails. I lost the little nail on my right foot weeks ago, and two of the remaining nine seem to be coming unmoored too.

I am not alone. Most long-distance runners have lost toenails. Marathons require months of training, and all that running can be hard on the feet. Rubbing begets blisters, which turn into calluses. But the toenails bear the brunt of the abuse. They bang against shoes and turn red or purple or black. Sometimes a blister forms underneath the nail, heaving the horny plate up off the nail bed. And just when you think that perhaps the nail has recovered, you roll over in bed, catch it on a blanket, and the whole thing goes flying off.  Continue reading

Physicians Who Do Harm

ThisIsNotAmericaGitmoProtest

First, do no harm. It’s a commandment often incorrectly attributed to the Hippocratic oath yet it provides an ethical foundation for modern medicine. The American Medical Association’s principles of medical ethics begins, “A physician shall be dedicated to providing competent medical care, with compassion and respect for human dignity and rights.”

But what happens when a physician violates this ethical code? This is not a hypothetical question — it’s a transgression happening right now at the U.S. military detention camp at Guantánamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba. On November 1st, a group of more than 35 physicians, former military personnel and health experts sent President Obama a letter demanding that he end the practice of force-feeding hunger strikers at the prison. The letter’s signers, who include a retired Brigadier General and former U.S. Surgeon General, identified themselves as deeply invested in maintaining the principles of medical ethics. “We believe that the practice of force-feeding hunger strikers at Guantánamo Bay severely breaches those principles and undermines medical care at the detention center,” they write.

This wasn’t supposed to happen. President Obama made a campaign promise to close “Gitmo,” and on January 22, 2009, he issued an Executive Order, “Closure Of Guantanamo Detention Facilities.” The order promised that, “The detention facilities at Guantánamo for individuals covered by this order shall be closed as soon as practicable, and no later than 1 year from the date of this order.” Continue reading