
Last Friday, Sarah used “touchstone” as a metaphor. I think she uses the metaphor — you touch a stone and see its landscape in time — in a way that’s poetically off-center from touchstone’s usual meaning. Which is a thing that’s solid, grounded, and reliable and which is the way I’ve used “touchstone,” because I have a long-standing issues around grounding and reliability. A touchstone is what you refer back to when you’ve become uncertain; it’s reliable certainty, isn’t it, a truth in which you can believe and by which everything can be judged.
But touchstones didn’t start out as metaphors, they’re real things, originally dark and fine-grained rocks, like slate. They’re used as a test for the type and purity of a metal. Specifically, gold — like, you’re paying for gold here, is it really gold? is it pure or has it been cut with baser metals? You draw a line, called a streak, on the touchstone with a piece of the metal, then look at the line’s color. If the streak is gold, the metal is gold and the gold is pure. If the streak is black, it’s pyrite, fool’s gold. If the streak is white, it’s silver; copper-colored, it’s copper. The more copper that’s alloyed with the gold, the redder the streak. Alloys of silver and copper, of silver, copper, and gold; and of tin and lead, all have their own streaks.
Continue reading







