Redux: A Wolf Dies

Recently, a bounty was announced for the poacher of wolf designated as OR-33 that was shot in Klamath County, Oregon. Rob Klavins, a staffer at the non-profit Oregon Wild, wrote a eulogy for the animal, in which he lamented that “[O]f all the wolves I’ve been privileged to have some deeper understanding of, not a single one has yet died a natural death.” This week, I have a long feature out about the life and death of another wolf, OR-4–though he was ultimately killed by the state.

Here’s an essay I wrote about another poached Oregon wolf, OR-28. It was originally published on October 25, 2016.

A black wolf, photographed midstride, with a prominent GPS collar
OR 28. Photo courtesy of ODFW.

Continue reading →

The Last Word

Did you miss anything from last week’s LWON joint? Have a look at the offerings.

Craig gave us sand—in our hair, in our teeth, in the minds and hearts of children. He waxes poetic about his family’s tackling of Great Sand Dunes National Park.

Eric, in a Redux, opens a window to a very personal side of illegal immigration—and shows us the door to a more neighborly way of being.

Guest poster Sarah Webb started a science café in Chattanooga that quickly became a refuge of reason in unreasonable times.

Michelle describes an extraordinary ornithological find, one of just two bird species known only to Cambodia, right at the edge of the capital city.

And I (Jennifer) discovered a biologic explanation for my own winter brain mush in an unlikely place: the head of the common shrew.

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

There’s Shrinkage

I love it when research into other animals is totally applicable to humans. A recent report on the common shrew (Sorex araneus), by Max Planck Institute researcher Javier Lazaro et al., reveals that the animal’s head shrinks drastically in winter. That includes its brain mass. Running this discovery up the food chain, I think I finally have an explanation for why I become a pile of useless mush starting around November 19 and lasting until the daffodils bloom.

But first, the shrew: Native to Eastern Europe, Great Britain, and Scandinavia, S. araneus is a furry little bugger that might have been adorable had the Monty Burns nose, beady eyes, and rat tail evolved into more hamster-like parts. (It also has front teeth that appear to be dipped in blood.) It does get cuteness points for the velvety fur, though. And really, this animal’s head reduction in cold weather is mighty impressive. When winter comes and food is scarce, according to studies performed in Germany, the skull can shrink some 15 percent while the brain might lose 30 percent of its mass.

Meanwhile, the animal gets smaller in other ways, too, by way of a shortened spine and shrunken heart, lungs, and spleen.The dropping temps appear to spark this breakdown and absorption of the cast-off bone and tissue. A shrew’s whip-fast metabolism suggests the all-over shrinkage has adaptive value, reducing the food needed to support the animal and all its parts during lean times.

In Spring the reduced parts bulk up again, although not necessarily to full size. Life is short for shrews, though, usually not more than a year, so it probably doesn’t matter if they stay a little small and a little dumb. (For the record, the authors of this study haven’t actually reported on the cognitive ability of the shrunken-head shrews compared with big-headed shrews. Maybe they’re all equally dumb. The shrews, not the scientists.)

But back to me. While my metabolism is no longer speeding along even when the world outside is warm and fruitful, in winter I’d say it comes to a full stop. My natural behavior is to crawl under a blanket and, as my husband describes it, “get small.” I eat mostly cheese. I have little to offer in conversations about politics, history, science, or stain removal. If my work gets done, it’s barely suitable for public eyes. I take in little oxygen and provide little love unless you are a dog willing to be a pillow. So, the diminished-organ phenomenon might apply. Mostly, I rock and moan in the semi-dark until the days get long again.

I’ll bet if those researchers measured they’d discover a 30 percent loss of my brain mass by Christmas. That would explain my lack of activity and woeful contribution to humankind, not to mention the balled-up holiday lights in the corner and the stream of filthy comedic specials droning in the background, all day every day. Or maybe it’s the mulled wine making those choices. One or the other.

Back to shrews again: A few other shrew species appear to have similar physical reductions, and the scientists say that the phenomenon may be more common that we know, especially in animals with high metabolisms that don’t hibernate or migrate—when such resource savings makes the most sense. It’s pretty neat to consider the diverse ways animals adapt to changing environments to help ensure survival to the next breeding season. Me, I’m not sure how adaptive it is, but if you need me I’ll be here with own shriveled brain, hiding under this dog blanket gnawing on a hunk of cheddar. Please don’t ask me any questions.


X-ray image of common shrew by JAVIER LÁZARO [permission requested; apology at the ready]

Shrew: By Sjonge at English Wikipedia – Own work, originally from en.wikipedia; description page is/was here., Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=3023495

Redux: Science Meets Bird, Bird Meets Science

This week, news of the rediscovery of the Jackson’s climbing salamander in Guatemala has me thinking about all the species that lie just out of sight. Here’s one I first wrote about in 2013.

Late last year, during a reporting trip in Cambodia, I shared a car for a couple of days with Simon Mahood, a British ornithologist who works for the Wildlife Conservation Society in Phnom Penh. Mahood, a devoted birdwatcher since childhood, was full of stories about the rare birds and remote places of Southeast Asia. But there was one story he kept to himself.

On the floodplains around Phnom Penh, within sight of the new skyscrapers in the city center, Mahood and his colleagues had seen a bird they couldn’t identify. They knew it was a tailorbird, a wrenlike bird that stitches a cradle for its nests out of leaves and spider silk. But this bird didn’t look or sound quite like the tailorbirds they were familiar with. Maybe it was just an odd individual, they thought. Over several weeks and several early-morning trips, they saw another of the unusual birds, and then another.

Continue reading →

Guest Post: Reaffirming Reason in Chattanooga

Almost exactly a year ago, as I drove across one of the bridges that span the Tennessee River near my home in Chattanooga, Tennessee, a bumper sticker “Proud of everything a liberal hates” flashed before me on the back of a white pickup truck. My stomach clenched. Even now, every time I think about that moment, the bile rises.

In Chattanooga, a purple island in a deep red state, I’m hardly surprised when my politics don’t align with those of my neighbors. But as a science writer during a time when both the scientific method and free speech are constantly, mercilessly, under attack, slogans like those on the back of the pickup truck aren’t just political but personal, and they can make me feel wildly alone.

But I’ve found a refuge from that loneliness: I started a science café. We met for the first time last November, the night after the presidential election. Continue reading →

Redux: Stranger in a Foreign Land

This story has little do with science. Unless you consider the science of empathy. We often think of empathy as a form of pity but in ethology that’s not what it is at all. It’s about seeing the world through someone else’s eyes. And nothing has help me more with that than living in Mexico.  
shutterstock_325992425 (1)
I know this guy. He’s a good guy – hard working, wants to do right by his wife and kid – but somehow he’s found himself in an unusual position in the debate over US/Mexico immigration.

This fellow adores his home country but also has a healthy sense of wanderlust. Yes he loves his countrymen and his family but also wants to see the world and take on new challenges. So a few years ago he crossed the US/Mexico border in a less-than-legal way.

He could have stayed home, he made enough money to support a meager existence there, but he sensed there were more opportunities if he crossed the border. A better life – more money, better living conditions – and adventure to boot! Imagine the things he would see and the stories he could tell when he got home. He’d be a man of the world.

So he did it. He didn’t have paperwork but he had a plan and he managed to pull it off. And he was right. This new country was everything he’d hoped for – work, adventure, opportunity. Finally he could afford to raise his family and live the life he wanted. He worked hard while socking money away with an eye towards buying a house back home someday – all the while trying desperately to not insult the people around him. Continue reading →

The Last Word

October 23 – 27, 2017

Guest Rebecca Boyle takes issue with Cassie’s attitude about neutron star mergers.  Argument sounds a little abstruse but it ends in humane charm: “I’ll stay on Team Neutron Star, and you can watch from the sidelines, and we’ll still be friends.”

Craig finds a woman attractive, reflects that not all #MeToo’s happen to women — I can’t sum this up, you’ll just need to read it. Knives are involved.

Sarah’s out in the outback, hiking with her friends, feeling blissful.  An older woman meeting them says, “It’s so nice to see such healthy young women, enjoying themselves.”  Oh yes.

Christie’s original post that made the Finkbeiner Test — what not to say in a profile of a woman scientist — famous across the entire galaxy was written for a site now dead.  She remedies that.

In light of those merging neutron stars, I remember some lovely gossip about two of the physicists’ heroes who helped think up the neutron stars and black holes both.  They didn’t like each other.

Redux: Johnny and Oppie

So.  Everybody got excited about gravitational waves coming from the mergers of neutron stars and black holes.  My Facebook feed which is full of scientists and science writers got further excited about a newish phrase everybody used, “multimessenger astronomy.”  My Facebook feed agreed that “multimessenger astronomy” is an all-around dreadful phrase.  Not only does it sound corporate and canned but even astronomy writers don’t immediately know what it means.  It means astronomy done not only with the usual messengers, that is, all the wavelengths of light; but also with elementary particles called neutrinos and cosmic rays and of course, with the disturbances in space/time called gravitational waves.  If explaining a name takes a sentence that long and complicated, the name is not good.

During the Facebook conversation, somebody suggested putting the astronomers good at naming things — like, for instance, “dark energy” — in charge of naming everything.  Then somebody else said that John Wheeler had been excellent at it, naming among other things, “black holes.”  At that point I got all pedantic and as any discussion does in the face of pedantry, the Facebook discussion turned in another direction.

Anyway, since black holes are famous again, I thought you’d like to know some gossip about who thought them up in the first place and who named them.  It was a couple of physicists’ heroes who happened also to have thought up the nuclear bomb, Johnny and Oppie.†  They didn’t like each other. Continue reading →