Bad Things Are Fast, Good Things Are Slow

Carving the Grand Canyon was slow. (Photo by Laura Helmuth)

Bad things happen quickly; good things take time. This isn’t a perfect pattern, of course, but I think it’s real and worth thinking about. 

A wildfire, explosion, earthquake, pandemic, gunshot, car crash, heart attack—all fast. Cancer typically starts out slow but then gets fast. Climate change seems slow, but the reason it’s so dangerous is that, from a geological, evolutionary, and cultural perspective, it’s fast.

Some good things are fast. A joke, an insight, a rare bird sighting. Someone runs into a burning building and saves a child. 

But most good things are slow, and that’s especially true for science. It took the longitudinal Framingham Heart Study, which started in 1948 and is still going, to identify the biggest risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Long-term datasets like the Keeling Curve, documenting atmospheric carbon dioxide levels from Mauna Loa, Hawai’i, provide some of the best evidence for anthropogenic climate change. (Withdrawing its funding, as the Trump administration threatens to do, is fast.) Drug development is slow. Restoring endangered species is slow. Restoring ecosystems is slow. Designing, building, launching, receiving and analyzing data from, and then sharing images from a space mission to Saturn? Slow.  

Those of us who cover science sometimes gripe about the embargo system and the power of a small number of research journals to determine the news. (The embargo system is an agreement between journals like Science or Nature and credentialed journalists. We get a few days’ notice of what they’re publishing, which gives us a chance to contact outside experts for context and do decent reporting (ideally) before publishing a story when the next edition of the journal comes out.) But what the embargo system, and the scientific publishing system in general, give us is a way to make something slow, fast. To make it “news.” 

It typically takes many years for paleontologists to find a fossil, extract it, date it, determine its taxonomy, document their case that it’s a new species, submit a report to a journal, go through peer review and editing, and finally publish their results. The headline? “Enormous New Pterosaur Discovered,” like it happened yesterday. 

The news has a bias for what’s new, and that’s one reason why good and slow things are under-understood and underappreciated. Smoking-related death rates have declined dramatically, but not so quickly that it counts much as news. Thank you, by the way, to all the researchers, advocates, and journalists who shared the truth about smoking’s dangers despite highly-funded merchants of doubt. That took a long time, longer than it should have. And thanks to everyone who fought to get smoking banned from airplanes, restaurants, office buildings—we should build monuments to you.

It’s not just the news that has a bias for short-term thinking. Venture capitalists and even philanthropies want to launch a shiny new thing, but often pull funding prematurely to go fund the next shiny new thing. Politicians are always looking at quick wins to highlight during their next election campaign. Funding research, education, public health, infrastructure and other long-term investments are better for their constituents but don’t get the appreciation they deserve.

A lot of bad things are happening right now, quickly. It takes forever to set up life-saving clinical trials, but no time at all for sociopaths to stop them. It takes a lot of effort to suppress dangerous diseases like measles, and no time at all for sociopaths to spread lies about them. It takes a lot of time to build up a federal workforce with experience and expertise, and no time at all for sociopaths to fire them. The people who move fast and break things are some of the most dangerous people alive. The rest of us, as much as we can, must try to stop them, to fix things, to move slow and build things.

Redux: Remnant of Eden

IMG_2596

This post first ran in the spring of 2015 and I’ve often wondered if this patch of earth in Iowa is still guarded.

A summer not long ago I went for a grueling 3-day backpack through GMO cornfields in Iowa, camping among walls of waxy green leaves that sawed against each other in the breeze. I wanted to see what besides corn and soybeans lived out here. Not much, I found. Spiders and ants were few and only the smallest species survived. There were some mushrooms, but not many, and I happened into a whitetail deer one night. Otherwise, it was a catastrophic biological landscape, as if a bomb had gone off killing almost everything but a couple engineered species.

Thrashing out of the hot, dripping fields, my skin coated in sweat and grimy soil the consistency of shoe polish, I set off looking for signs of biologic hope in the area. I ended up at small patch of what is called virgin prairie, a plot of ground near the forgotten town of Butler Center where crops had never been planted. The town itself was gone, plowed under and turned into rows of corn, while this plot called the Clay Hills Preserve had been set aside. No plow had ever touched the ground.

Ruth Haan, a woman in her eighties, was one of the last on a board of volunteers overseeing the preserve. Locals warned me that Haan was losing her mental faculties. Her niece who drove her to the site to meet me on a blistering summer day said right in front of her that she was getting a little loopy.

“Oh, honey, I just need a little help now and then,” Haan said in her sundress, the fat of her arms hanging like handbags.

Haan pushed her wheeled walker across bumpy ground to reach the fence marking the refuge that she’d known her entire life. “Volunteers haven’t met for quite a while because most of us have died,” she said. “I sure hope someone will keep an eye on this after I’m gone; it’s the last piece around.”

Continue reading →

On Short Break – Be Back Soon

We’re taking and have taken a short break and we’ll be back on Friday, 1/2/2026. Don’t lose faith. We still love you, we do.

_________

By Petar Milošević – https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=147441865

The Gifts That Keep on Giving

Happy holidays, readers! Today we’ve got a special group post for you — a roundup of the best and worst gifts we’ve ever received. Enjoy! (And please post yours in the comments for the enjoyment of all). We’ll be back bright-eyed and bushy-tailed in 2026.

Jenny

The best and worst gifts were both from my spouse. Worst first: He gave me a beautifully wrapped little box to open at a restaurant on my birthday and inside was an ugly shark-tooth necklace bought by a teenage me at the beach that HE DUG OUT FROM MY OWN JEWELRY COLLECTION. He thought he was very funny. I was less amused. (I think I’ve shared this story in a previous “worst gifts” post. It’s still the worst.)

Best: Husband’s favorite car as a young person was the Mazda RX7 (he had one when I met him, in fact), which was also my favorite as a teen. (Did we fall in love over a sexy sports car? It didn’t hurt.) For those not in the auto know, the RX7 has a unique rotary engine designed by a dude named Felix Wankel. (It’s also called the Wankel engine. You’re welcome.) So John went down some rabbit holes online, as one does, in search of rotary-engine-themed jewelry. What he found is a heavy metal pendant that I love and wear a lot. It sparks lots of questions since nobody knows what the heck it is. (He got matching silver earrings, too.)

Continue reading →

Saint Rock

A rotund Magellanic penguin sitting on an egg under a scrubby bush.

I am lately returned from Punta Tombo, the Magellanic penguin breeding colony in Argentina where I spend several weeks each year. One of my tasks there is to open the field season in late October, which means I spend a lot of the early days stumping around our designated study areas looking for study penguins. Over the years we have marked many thousands, but they come and go. Some die at sea during the austral winter, some decide not to breed in a given year, some change nests, and so on. The start of a season therefore basically amounts to an exercise in accounting, as we peer into burrows or under bushes to see who is where and whether or not we know them.

By the time I arrive, the penguins have been at the colony for a month or so. Males start to arrive in mid-September to establish or reclaim territories. Females come a couple of weeks later and soon lay their clutch of two eggs, after which the males leave for what we call the long incubation foraging trip. This trip can last a couple of weeks or more. In most cases when we find a study bird, then, it is a female sitting on her eggs alone, her mate being off at sea. But the sex ratio at Punta Tombo is heavily skewed towards males; there might be three or four for every female. This means many males who never got a mate are still hanging around.

Bachelor males, as we think of them, react to their predicament in different ways. They might solicit copulations from every single female that toddles across their visual plane. Many get into fights with other bachelors, brawling until they are soaked with blood. A few basically force themselves into a nest with a female and in effect pretend to be her mate, while she sits on her eggs and stares at him balefully; we call these males home invaders. Others, curiously, will sit on a rock as if it were an egg.

Continue reading →

Redux: Trip Schooling

This post first ran in April of 2019 and the 6th grader I’m referring to is now in college and I’m leaving every possibility open to journey with them again.

I pulled my 6th grader out of school for a week to hit the road. I adore the public school teachers who spend time with my kid. They work their hearts out. But an oversized shoebox of a classroom is not enough to contain the curiosity or educational needs of kids who know there’s a real world out there that you can taste, touch, and smell.

In the 2010-11 school year, 51% of school districts nationwide reported eliminating field trips, according to a survey of the American Association of School Administrators. The numbers of field trips nationwide have continued to decline. They have been replaced by increased standardized testing.

The U.S. Travel Association conducted a study of 400 American adults, half having taken an educational trip away from home and school between the ages of 12 and 18, half who hadn’t. Regardless of gender, ethnicity or socioeconomic status, kids who went on trips had better grades, higher graduation rates from high school and college, and greater income. You see why I had to get him out. I’m a fan of school and good grades, but a much bigger fan of being on the ground. The brain works better out here.

We picked Phoenix, Arizona, as our location, and spent some of our days walking across the city using a chain of inner city mountain ranges, something that most people in this metropolitan area could do; free and relatively easy to access. Not a lot of discipline was involved, nothing particularly rigorous about our studies in local geology or the archaeological history of the region as we crossed through rocky saddles and climbed summit after summit, the city roaring around us. Our bodies worked. We sweated. We found gravel washes where we could lie in palo verde shade and nap.

Continue reading →

Immersion Research, Central Pennsylvania

The little creek that runs along the railroad tracks through Bellefonte, Pennsylvania is beautiful at this time of year, shallow water running clear and dark, banks and bare branches covered in snow. The creek is a tributary of Bald Eagle Creek, itself a tributary of the West Branch Susquehanna. It’s the place my husband first learned to paddle a kayak — something he started doing to impress girls, he says, but which eventually turned into a passion and, for a not-insignificant period of his life, an all-consuming purpose. 

That’s the first waterfall I ever rode down, Pete tells me, pointing to a low-head dam in the middle of Bellefonte’s quaint downtown. We’re in a rented minivan, heat blasting, our son fast asleep in his carseat. Low-head dams are sometimes called drowning machines, due to the dangerous recirculating currents they form, and this one looks particularly nasty, with jagged branches and other debris sticking out of the foam. 

Am I impressed by Pete’s teenage antics? Not particularly.

But I do love hearing about the summers he spent working for Wizzard’s Janitorial, his family business. The night jobs lasted until dawn, at which point he’d load up his boat, go kayaking for a few hours, then get right back in the truck to go do another cleaning job. On bingo nights he worked at the Lion’s Club; later, he got a job at the Penn State cafeteria. Any time he wasn’t working, (or in school???) it seems, he was on the water.

Cleaning, then kayaking. Kayaking, then cleaning. I love that Pete was so drawn to the river as a boy and young man, I tell him as we drive along the creek. Not really, he corrects me —  in addition to impressing girls, he joined the local kayaking club to keep up with his best friend. Pete is not a strong swimmer — is, in fact, still terrified of water — so it was fear, not love, that drove his rapid progression. The better you are at kayaking, the less likely you are to drown. But it worked. By seventeen or so, Pete was really good at kayaking — good enough to have a (long) shot at qualifying for the 2004 Olympics in Athens. 

We park the minivan next to a slouching corrugated-tin boathouse with a pile of slalom kayaks in the back, half-buried in snow. They look sleek and sharp, ready to slice and dance. This is where Pete’s coach — a guy with a van who charged basically nothing to teach local kids how to boat — ran his little kayaking club. How delighted he must have been to see his protégé become an artist — because that’s what Pete looks like in photos: Someone whose every line, from spine to forearm, was formed in relationship with moving water. 

But instead of going to Greece at 17, Pete joined the military. Just this evening, Pete’s father told me what it felt like when the Marines showed up at the front door to take his son away to bootcamp. A year ago, I couldn’t have imagined it. Now, with Will on my lap, I can.

In a post 9/11 blaze of (what he now describes as self-righteous, adolescent) certainty, Pete shipped off to Iraq. Years later, after leaving the military, his childhood pastime grew into something closer to obsession. He moved to my hometown, in California, to be closer to the steep rivers that plunge off Sierra Nevada granite. He committed to an almost ascetic life of river-chasing, living out of a battered old truck with shoddy brakes, and had only just upgraded to a more functional red Tacoma when I met him — and dismissed him as just another dirtbag kayaker. Pete was cute, but too one-dimensional (cute) to hold my interest, I thought. As someone with an established weakness for complexity (in both life and men), I feared that Pete lacked layers.

Now, nearly ten years later, we are driving through the gently rolling hills of Pennsylvania — the first time I have traveled with Pete to his home town a few miles from Bellefonte. It is stunningly beautiful, even if the snow does looks like it’s been scraped over stubble. The sunset — reflected on cloud, reflected on snow-dusted cornfields — makes me catch my breath. Just like it does in my own tiny hometown, though, I can also sense how this expanse of empty space could make you claustrobic with loneliness.

Here, rivers are more than waterways — they are companions. Visiting the little creeks that shaped Pete’s adolescence is like meeting his parents; it helps me understand where he came from, and something about who he is now — someone for whom rivers supplied not just fun or adventure, but an essential connection.

Pete has almost stopped kayaking since Will was born 18 months ago, a change so drastic that those who know him have started whispering about interventions. I haven’t spent much time on the river either, but it feels like a less dramatic change for me — perhaps because I was never as serious about boating as Pete has always been, or because I have a greater variety of hobbies and interests.

One day, when I have Will to myself in Bellefonte, I take him on a little 30-minute train ride that follows the creek. We pass the kayak shack and the slalom course, and Will presses his nose and hands against the glass. “That’s where your dad learned to kayak!,” I tell him, pointing out the boats and ducks and little rapids. 

As we chug along, I realize that unlike some of Pete’s friends, I am not particularly worried about his recent retreat from rivers. Maybe that’s because I have come to appreciate his knack for being fully immersed in whatever he’s doing at any given moment, something I initially mistook as a certain lack of depth.

Right now Pete is doing two big things: Teaching high school and being Will’s dad. I could worry more about that, I suppose… but no — I honestly can’t. Come to think of it, my chock-full life with Pete and Will has somewhat curbed my old appetite for complexity, or at least my tendency to make things more complicated than they need to be. It is enough — at least for now — to be fully immersed, together. 

My Favorite Books of 2025

For a few years now, I’ve been going through my annual list of books read and picking my favorites. (Here’s 2024 and 2022. I guess I didn’t share my list in 2023, though I did contribute to some of LWON’s best of the year lists.) 

This year, wow! I read a lot of really great books. It was really hard to choose, but I managed to pare my favorites list down to a dozen, starting with my top four.

Terrestrial History by Joe Mungo Reed
Big thanks to Lila for recommending this; I loved it too! This book really stayed with me. The novel follows four generations of a single family —mother (Hannah), son (Andrew), his daughter (Kenzie) and her son (Roban). Hannah is a scientist in our present day who’s working to make a fusion reactor. As climate change accelerates, society starts to collapse and there’s a private effort to colonize Mars. Andrew dedicates himself to pushing for collective action to save Earth, while Kenzie joins the effort to start again on a new planet. I hadn’t heard of Reed, but I wasn’t surprised to learn that he has a master’s in philosophy and history. The book does a fine job of exploring ethical and philosophical issues raised by climate change and the prospect of human settlements on Mars. There’s also an ongoing tension between working together as a society for the collective good versus privatizing the future. The character development is outstanding and I especially loved the way Mungo Reed depicts and unfolds the mother-son and father-daughter relationships. There’s some really beautiful writing. The book left me feeling both deeply sad but also hopeful in a surprising way. 

Orbitalby Samantha Harvey
This was another novel that really captivated me. It takes place over the course of a single 24-hour period, and tells the story of six astronauts aboard the space station, which makes 16 orbits around the Earth during this time. That’s about the extent of the plot. Nothing much happens, and yet…the novel holds so much. We get stories from the astronauts’ lives on Earth, but at its core this book is a loving tribute to planet Earth and all its majesty. The writing is absolutely gorgeous as it describes the awe of our planet and grief for loved ones but also for the damage being done to our home in the universe.  

Ship Fever by Andrea Barrett
I’m slowly working my way through Barrett’s back catalogue and loving every word she writes. This collection of short stories won her the National Book Award in 1996, and rightly so. The common threads in these stories are science and love. Many of the stories take place in the nineteenth century, and Carl Linnaeus (“father of taxonomy”) appears in one of them. There’s also a story of love and betrayal and the title story follows a young doctor treating Irish immigrants to Canada during the typhoid epidemic of 1847. It’s a grim historical event, beautifully told. She captures something essential to the human condition. 

Heart the Lover by Lily King
I’m not ashamed to admit this book made me cry. I absolutely loved my first Lily King novel, Writers & Lovers, and I think I loved this one even more. The novel tells the story of three college friends and their sort of love triangle. In college, they all yearn for a life in literature, but only the protagonist follows through, becoming a successful novelist. The narrative begins when they are in college, then fast forwards to the characters in middle life, when the dreams of their youth have met the realities of adulthood. This is a story about friendship, love, regret and forgiveness. The characters are complex, flawed, and easy to love. It turns out (revealed in the last line, but only to those in the know) that the protagonist of this novel is also the protagonist of Writers & Lovers, so after finishing this, I went back and re-read that book and loved it just as much the second time.

Continue reading →