Ice Dreams

U.S. military personnel at Camp Century, the “city under the ice” in northern Greenland, circa 1960. (U.S. Army photo)


At the height of the last Cold War the U.S. military burrowed into a glacier in northernmost Greenland and installed a nuclear reactor. The reactor was small—“experimental,” the army called it—and designed to power a base that had also been built under the ice. The base was called Camp Century, and it could house up to 200 scientists and military personnel in several tomb-like tunnels. While there wasn’t much to do in the “city under the ice” aside from work, sleep, and eat, its residents lived in relative comfort, considering, of course, that they were inside a glacier at the top of the world. 

There were showers and meals made hot by atomic power, there were bunk beds, a gym and a library. During the days, while scientists conducted research in one region of the base, engineers working in another began drilling down into the ice, to see how just how deep they might go. When I researched Camp Century last year for a piece I was working on, an ice base veteran named Austin Kovacs told me he’d never felt weird living there, so close to the reactor.

Every day, he told me, soldiers walked through the base swinging Geiger counters back and forth, like priests toting censers, listening for the uptight ticks or flat-out screech that would indicate trouble. But these sounds never came, and so the soldiers’ routine passage through the tunnels, the calm sweep of their counters in the darkness, came to feel like some kind of safety.


Lately I’ve been thinking a lot of that story. With Greenland in the news, with fresh threats and bullying pouring out of the White House each day. What it all says about who we are, what we’ll do. Would the U.S. really try to take Greenland, or buy it? Would we really invade? 

The president says America “needs” Greenland for security reasons, but as a few reporters have noted, old agreements between the U.S. and the Kingdom of Denmark (which Greenland is still part of) already allow the American military great latitude when it comes to defending itself, NATO, and Greenland. There were, during the middle years of the last Cold War, several American military bases and airfields on the massive island. Camp Century, with its sketchy reactor and sci-fi vibes, was merely the strangest of them. 

And yet no takeover or annexation was necessary for the construction of any of those bases—not even for the creation of a subglacial nuclear-powered one. Maybe it goes without saying that the Danes were not pleased to learn of Camp Century, and the Inuit, who make up the majority of the island’s population, were never asked for their consent. The U.S. simply went ahead and did what it wanted—what it thought would be cool. All this is to say that when the president suggests Greenland should be invaded or otherwise overtaken for “security” reasons, it is nothing more than a lie. And yet this word, security, has been repeated so often by politicians and the media that one day soon, if we are not very careful, it may become a chant, a refrain, reassuring as the soft tick of Geiger counter in a tunnel under the ice.


One by one most of America’s Cold War bases in Greenland were shut down as the threat of war with the Soviet Union lessened, or changed shape. In 1964 Camp Century’s nuclear reactor was fished up from the ice and hauled back to the States for burial somewhere out West. A few years later the base was abandoned. Much of the infrastructure—and a great many tons of radioactive wastewater, along with human and chemical waste—was simply left in place, to be slowly absorbed by the glacier. When Austin Kovacs went back to survey Camp Century a couple years after it was shut down

“… he found [it was] a total ruin. In a series of photographs he made of the base, one can see something like a mining disaster unfolding in slow motion. Tongues of snow spill down passageways. Steel structures collapse on themselves. Wood beams splinter like bones. The photos give form to the glacier’s overwhelming and otherwise invisible weight. Humans had been gone only a short time, but already there was the suggestion of an inevitable one-way journey—the debris being crushed, then swallowed, never to rise again.”


Kovacs and his survey team were the last humans to visit the site. After they left, the base vanished into the ice and was all but forgotten for half a century. When I first began writing about it, I thought of Camp Century as a sort of time capsule, hidden away beneath the ice, a cluster of artifacts waiting to resurface and remind us of our folly. 

Now I see the story as an American parable, one among many, all of them linked to the one we’re living through now. When I asked Kovacs if he’d ever told his children stories of his life under the ice he thought for a moment and said No. When I asked why, he couldn’t say.

After the Gold Rush

My first week on a real journalism job in Yellowknife, 20 years ago, my boss took me to see the old Giant Mine site. It wasn’t among the tourist traps of the Northwest Territories, but he felt this was a place I needed to understand if I was going to report on industry in the North. Inside, the crew quarters looked like Pompeii–everything from papers to work boots left in place, though scattered–but when we started climbing the decayed stairs inside the head frame, they were so rickety even our twenty-something bravado met its limits.

Last month, Canadian Geographic called me up and asked me to investigate the Northern mine’s legacy after I wrote a feature for them on Ontario’s Ring of Fire mineral region. Now, after 10 years away from Yellowknife and 20 years since that early magazine job led me to Giant Mine, I’m going back to see what all has changed.

Gold mining was the original reason our city existed, and diamond mining was a reason it endured. But Giant Mine, in particular, was a gold mine that left a complex legacy in the form of 237,000 tons of arsenic trioxide. At the time I visited the site, it was loosely piled in the rough-blasted chambers degrading under our feet, with water seeping in and out. 237,000 tons is enough trioxide to kill the world’s population several times over, and it sat squarely within city limits. The permafrost that had frozen it in place for decades had melted when they added open pits to the mine.

Continue reading

Bad Things Are Fast, Good Things Are Slow

Carving the Grand Canyon was slow. (Photo by Laura Helmuth)

Bad things happen quickly; good things take time. This isn’t a perfect pattern, of course, but I think it’s real and worth thinking about. 

A wildfire, explosion, earthquake, pandemic, gunshot, car crash, heart attack—all fast. Cancer typically starts out slow but then gets fast. Climate change seems slow, but the reason it’s so dangerous is that, from a geological, evolutionary, and cultural perspective, it’s fast.

Some good things are fast. A joke, an insight, a rare bird sighting. Someone runs into a burning building and saves a child. 

But most good things are slow, and that’s especially true for science. It took the longitudinal Framingham Heart Study, which started in 1948 and is still going, to identify the biggest risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Long-term datasets like the Keeling Curve, documenting atmospheric carbon dioxide levels from Mauna Loa, Hawai’i, provide some of the best evidence for anthropogenic climate change. (Withdrawing its funding, as the Trump administration threatens to do, is fast.) Drug development is slow. Restoring endangered species is slow. Restoring ecosystems is slow. Designing, building, launching, receiving and analyzing data from, and then sharing images from a space mission to Saturn? Slow.  

Those of us who cover science sometimes gripe about the embargo system and the power of a small number of research journals to determine the news. (The embargo system is an agreement between journals like Science or Nature and credentialed journalists. We get a few days’ notice of what they’re publishing, which gives us a chance to contact outside experts for context and do decent reporting (ideally) before publishing a story when the next edition of the journal comes out.) But what the embargo system, and the scientific publishing system in general, give us is a way to make something slow, fast. To make it “news.” 

It typically takes many years for paleontologists to find a fossil, extract it, date it, determine its taxonomy, document their case that it’s a new species, submit a report to a journal, go through peer review and editing, and finally publish their results. The headline? “Enormous New Pterosaur Discovered,” like it happened yesterday. 

The news has a bias for what’s new, and that’s one reason why good and slow things are under-understood and underappreciated. Smoking-related death rates have declined dramatically, but not so quickly that it counts much as news. Thank you, by the way, to all the researchers, advocates, and journalists who shared the truth about smoking’s dangers despite highly-funded merchants of doubt. That took a long time, longer than it should have. And thanks to everyone who fought to get smoking banned from airplanes, restaurants, office buildings—we should build monuments to you.

It’s not just the news that has a bias for short-term thinking. Venture capitalists and even philanthropies want to launch a shiny new thing, but often pull funding prematurely to go fund the next shiny new thing. Politicians are always looking at quick wins to highlight during their next election campaign. Funding research, education, public health, infrastructure and other long-term investments are better for their constituents but don’t get the appreciation they deserve.

A lot of bad things are happening right now, quickly. It takes forever to set up life-saving clinical trials, but no time at all for sociopaths to stop them. It takes a lot of effort to suppress dangerous diseases like measles, and no time at all for sociopaths to spread lies about them. It takes a lot of time to build up a federal workforce with experience and expertise, and no time at all for sociopaths to fire them. The people who move fast and break things are some of the most dangerous people alive. The rest of us, as much as we can, must try to stop them, to fix things, to move slow and build things.

Redux: Remnant of Eden

IMG_2596

This post first ran in the spring of 2015 and I’ve often wondered if this patch of earth in Iowa is still guarded.

A summer not long ago I went for a grueling 3-day backpack through GMO cornfields in Iowa, camping among walls of waxy green leaves that sawed against each other in the breeze. I wanted to see what besides corn and soybeans lived out here. Not much, I found. Spiders and ants were few and only the smallest species survived. There were some mushrooms, but not many, and I happened into a whitetail deer one night. Otherwise, it was a catastrophic biological landscape, as if a bomb had gone off killing almost everything but a couple engineered species.

Thrashing out of the hot, dripping fields, my skin coated in sweat and grimy soil the consistency of shoe polish, I set off looking for signs of biologic hope in the area. I ended up at small patch of what is called virgin prairie, a plot of ground near the forgotten town of Butler Center where crops had never been planted. The town itself was gone, plowed under and turned into rows of corn, while this plot called the Clay Hills Preserve had been set aside. No plow had ever touched the ground.

Ruth Haan, a woman in her eighties, was one of the last on a board of volunteers overseeing the preserve. Locals warned me that Haan was losing her mental faculties. Her niece who drove her to the site to meet me on a blistering summer day said right in front of her that she was getting a little loopy.

“Oh, honey, I just need a little help now and then,” Haan said in her sundress, the fat of her arms hanging like handbags.

Haan pushed her wheeled walker across bumpy ground to reach the fence marking the refuge that she’d known her entire life. “Volunteers haven’t met for quite a while because most of us have died,” she said. “I sure hope someone will keep an eye on this after I’m gone; it’s the last piece around.”

Continue reading

On Short Break – Be Back Soon

We’re taking and have taken a short break and we’ll be back on Friday, 1/2/2026. Don’t lose faith. We still love you, we do.

_________

By Petar Milošević – https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=147441865

The Gifts That Keep on Giving

Happy holidays, readers! Today we’ve got a special group post for you — a roundup of the best and worst gifts we’ve ever received. Enjoy! (And please post yours in the comments for the enjoyment of all). We’ll be back bright-eyed and bushy-tailed in 2026.

Jenny

The best and worst gifts were both from my spouse. Worst first: He gave me a beautifully wrapped little box to open at a restaurant on my birthday and inside was an ugly shark-tooth necklace bought by a teenage me at the beach that HE DUG OUT FROM MY OWN JEWELRY COLLECTION. He thought he was very funny. I was less amused. (I think I’ve shared this story in a previous “worst gifts” post. It’s still the worst.)

Best: Husband’s favorite car as a young person was the Mazda RX7 (he had one when I met him, in fact), which was also my favorite as a teen. (Did we fall in love over a sexy sports car? It didn’t hurt.) For those not in the auto know, the RX7 has a unique rotary engine designed by a dude named Felix Wankel. (It’s also called the Wankel engine. You’re welcome.) So John went down some rabbit holes online, as one does, in search of rotary-engine-themed jewelry. What he found is a heavy metal pendant that I love and wear a lot. It sparks lots of questions since nobody knows what the heck it is. (He got matching silver earrings, too.)

Continue reading

Saint Rock

A rotund Magellanic penguin sitting on an egg under a scrubby bush.

I am lately returned from Punta Tombo, the Magellanic penguin breeding colony in Argentina where I spend several weeks each year. One of my tasks there is to open the field season in late October, which means I spend a lot of the early days stumping around our designated study areas looking for study penguins. Over the years we have marked many thousands, but they come and go. Some die at sea during the austral winter, some decide not to breed in a given year, some change nests, and so on. The start of a season therefore basically amounts to an exercise in accounting, as we peer into burrows or under bushes to see who is where and whether or not we know them.

By the time I arrive, the penguins have been at the colony for a month or so. Males start to arrive in mid-September to establish or reclaim territories. Females come a couple of weeks later and soon lay their clutch of two eggs, after which the males leave for what we call the long incubation foraging trip. This trip can last a couple of weeks or more. In most cases when we find a study bird, then, it is a female sitting on her eggs alone, her mate being off at sea. But the sex ratio at Punta Tombo is heavily skewed towards males; there might be three or four for every female. This means many males who never got a mate are still hanging around.

Bachelor males, as we think of them, react to their predicament in different ways. They might solicit copulations from every single female that toddles across their visual plane. Many get into fights with other bachelors, brawling until they are soaked with blood. A few basically force themselves into a nest with a female and in effect pretend to be her mate, while she sits on her eggs and stares at him balefully; we call these males home invaders. Others, curiously, will sit on a rock as if it were an egg.

Continue reading

Redux: Trip Schooling

This post first ran in April of 2019 and the 6th grader I’m referring to is now in college and I’m leaving every possibility open to journey with them again.

I pulled my 6th grader out of school for a week to hit the road. I adore the public school teachers who spend time with my kid. They work their hearts out. But an oversized shoebox of a classroom is not enough to contain the curiosity or educational needs of kids who know there’s a real world out there that you can taste, touch, and smell.

In the 2010-11 school year, 51% of school districts nationwide reported eliminating field trips, according to a survey of the American Association of School Administrators. The numbers of field trips nationwide have continued to decline. They have been replaced by increased standardized testing.

The U.S. Travel Association conducted a study of 400 American adults, half having taken an educational trip away from home and school between the ages of 12 and 18, half who hadn’t. Regardless of gender, ethnicity or socioeconomic status, kids who went on trips had better grades, higher graduation rates from high school and college, and greater income. You see why I had to get him out. I’m a fan of school and good grades, but a much bigger fan of being on the ground. The brain works better out here.

We picked Phoenix, Arizona, as our location, and spent some of our days walking across the city using a chain of inner city mountain ranges, something that most people in this metropolitan area could do; free and relatively easy to access. Not a lot of discipline was involved, nothing particularly rigorous about our studies in local geology or the archaeological history of the region as we crossed through rocky saddles and climbed summit after summit, the city roaring around us. Our bodies worked. We sweated. We found gravel washes where we could lie in palo verde shade and nap.

Continue reading