It was over 100 degrees several days this past week, where I live in Washington, and now we’re drowning in smoke. Needless to say, I’m craving something clean and cold. Maybe you are too? In which case, I pulled this from the archives for both of us:
Sometimes
in the spring
out walking
I get the feel
that the earth itself is speaking,
that it has its own language,
written in ice
Sorting through photos from our motion-triggered game camera reminds me a lot of field work. For every target animal you’re seeking, you end up looking at a lot of deer. So when I recently discovered a creature that I couldn’t immediately identify in our roll of game cam photos, I was thrilled.
It looked wide and strong, and for a split second I wondered if it could be a bear. But the size easily ruled that out — it was too small and squat.
Immediately, my mind went to the most exotic, exciting possibility — wolverine!
According to my National Audubon Society Field Guide to the Rocky Mountain States, the wolverine, or Gulo gulo, is “robust,” “bear-like” and “very strong and fearless for its size; drives bears from kill.”Its range includes western Colorado and its habitat is listed as forests, scrub and meadows, which pretty much describes the back acres of our farm where our game cam spotted the mystery creature. The wolverine’s lateral stripes “can range from extremely prominent to almost indiscernible,” according to the Wolverine Foundation.
By the time I downloaded the photo, there were no tracks left, so all I had to go on was the photo. Checking the photo with the species accounts, everything seemed to check out. Of course, it was just one datum, so I called in some backup.
I sent the photo to some wildlife savvy friends, and they were split. A lot of them agreed it could be a wolverine. A few others wondered if it were a badger.
The American badger, Taxidea taxus, also fit the description pretty well. The range, habitat and body shape — “wide, flattish,” according to the Audubon guide — all fit. While it’s not clear that there are any wolverines left in Colorado, badgers are pretty common in the state, which tilted the scales in its favor.
I’ll be honest, I wanted it to be wolverine. Well, sort of. They’re vicious killers so maybe I didn’t want them hanging around my chickens, cats and other animals. I didn’t really want a badger around either. Still, there’s something thrilling about the thought of a dangerous wild animal inhabiting a shared space.
After looking at a bunch of photos in my field guides and online, I decided it was probably a badger.
And then I downloaded the latest photos, the first of which were taken the day (night, really) after the mystery photo was shot. And here’s what I found.
Skunk! It was a skunk. As soon as I saw this photo (and a video of what was probably the same skunk the following night) I was convinced.
Why? Because until I had seen the second photo and video, I had very little hard evidence to go on. The notion that the animal was a wolverine or badger was based almost entirely on what could be seen on the photo. And really, that wasn’t much. In the age of the internet, we all know how deceptive photos can be.
Wild animals can be hard to identify on the fly (or run or in a single snapshot of a camera) and so it’s important to consider a principle called “base rate neglect” or the “base rate fallacy.” It’s the tendency to favor the most recent or individual information while ignoring the prior probability of a particular outcome. In this case, it was taking the bodily characteristics of an animal in a night photo as the most compelling evidence, without giving as much consideration to the probability that a wolverine would be lurking in my forest. It wasn’t impossible that it was a wolverine, but chances were much greater that it was not. Badgers are more common around here than wolverines, and skunks are even more widespread still. I also had lots of prior evidence that there were skunks around — I’d chased one out of my garden shed multiple times.
The base rate principle is useful for birding too. Hawks are notoriously difficult to identify when they’re high in the air. We have lots of them around here, and I usually look up and say, “Look, a red-tailed hawk!” Because chances are, I’ll be correct.
Wolverine image: Max Pixel. Badger by Jonathunder
This post first ran on June 19, 2018.
The other day my dad, who is 93 and losing his mind in dribs and drabs, asked me over the phone if we could FaceTime with his parents. I didn’t lie. I said, well, the technology is advancing quickly but it’s not quite advanced enough to reach them where they are. (True!) Maybe someday?
I mean, why not.
And I thought about what it must be like to be in his head, totally believing that his parents are out there somewhere waiting for our call. Trusting their voices would fill the room (and their faces the screen?) if we only had the right number. I suspect in his mind’s eye they are youngish people still. Maybe this: His mom in her flowered housecoat (faded from so much wash and wear) shuffling around the kitchen waiting for the brisket to cook and boiling the flavor and snap out of string beans in a big pot on the stove. His dad, a physician, coming in the back door looking dapper, as working men at that time always looked (it was the hats), loosening his tie and peeking under the pot lid at the flaccid beans and giving his wife a quick kiss for her efforts, like in some mid-century commercial for Maxwell House or Rolaids.
The phone on the wall, a black rotary Bakelite, is ringing. It’s us! There’s no video, of course, but there is a large receiver to cradle between shoulder and ear and a springy cord that stretches to the sink or stove, for multitasking. (Remember ducking under those cords? And fighting to untangle them so they’d hang right?) My dad called his mother Ma. “Ma? It’s Martin.” I’m not sure what he called his dad, now that I think about it. He was always “my father” when dad talked about him. “My father was an incredible human being. My father was a wonderful physician. My father made house calls and everyone loved him.” His father, my grandfather, died suddenly of a heart attack in his 50s, long before I was born. My dad always teared up when he talked about him. “I wish you kids had met my father,” he’d say. Not “I wish my father had met you kids.” Always the other way around. His father was that special.
Maybe my dad called him Pa, to go with Ma? I need to ask him, ASAP. I hope he remembers.
Anyway, maybe that’s what fills his mental FaceTime: His parents going about their lives, making dinner, anticipating his call, happy to hear his voice. Alive and well with many years in front of them. God, I hope so.
Near where I live in Seattle there is a rail trail called the Burke-Gilman. Everyone around here knows it simply as The Burke. An asphalt conduit that bisects north Seattle from Bothell to the Ballard Locks, The Burke is over twenty miles long, and a classic multiuse recreational urban route. Bicyclists fly over it, people walk along it, there is the occasional rollerblader or rollerskier. Myself, I run.
I enjoy my morning runs on The Burke. I think of them as Nature Trots. I’ve seen all manner of things, in all seasons, in all years. Raccoons, coyotes, moles, enormous rats, shrews, mice, bats. A couple of mountain beavers, even.
Me being me, I focus on birds. The Burke can be pretty lively, being for much of its length a greenbelt of sorts. Lots of chickadees and bushtits and nuthatches and warblers and sparrows and the odd vireo and other small flitty things. During the shoulder seasons I watch for migrants, like hermit thrushes on their way to or from the mountains. I’ve seen dunlins from time to time, a whimbrel. The list could go on and on.
Sometimes I see examples of the fraught territorial overlaps between the human and the non-human. Once I watched a nuthatch try to excavate a nesting cavity out of a metal rainspout, hammering away in vain. And one dark fall morning I was attacked from behind by a barred owl. Feeling the sharp shock of its talons on my scalp, I yelped and flailed until it let go and flew up to a tree. It then proceeded to chase me for another quarter mile, while I alternately sprinted from it or threw myself to the ground when it swept overhead.
Continue reading
Hieronymous Bosch, the Temptation of St. Anthony. Via Wikimedia Commons.
When I was a student studying literature, I kept seeing Christ allegories everywhere. I remember being assigned The Old Man and the Sea, one of many Hemingways I read that semester, and I remember my teacher asking what we thought the book was about. Answers included “death’s inevitability” and “the fallacy of humanity’s power over nature” and other tropes. But it was about Christ. It was undeniably about Christ and Santiago was his avatar. He holds the rope for three days, and it cuts his palms like the stigmata; that much I still remember.
So much of art and literature and cinema offers the same allegory, and some stories and characters are of course more obvious than others. Aslan in The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe is obvious; Anakin Skywalker in Star Wars: the Phantom Menace maybe less so, but watch it again. Ripley in Alien 3, Neo in the Matrix trilogy, Superman in Zack Snyder’s Man of Steel, every single Mel Gibson character.
But in the past few years, Christ has become less obvious to me. Or, at least, the greatest story ever told is no longer the prevailing motif in the stories I read and watch. There is a different sacrificial lamb, a different tragedy, though I suppose a similar foil. All stories are climate allegories.
I started thinking about this a few years ago, but it has felt ever more present in this summer of hellish fire and heat. The first time a climate allegory became obvious to me was the sparkling 2012 novel The Age of Miracles. It is about a girl going through puberty, as she and her family experience personal crises against the backdrop of planetary calamity. The calamity is a sudden inexplicable slowing of Earth’s rotation, but the connection to climate change was evident.
A writer colleague recently asked, in a large group, for suggestions of books that are climate allegories, whether obvious or not. Her main example was Barbara Kingsolver’s lovely Flight Behavior, a beautiful climate change story that has stuck with me over the years. My colleague was hoping to avoid speculative fiction or science fiction/fantasy, but was open to any ideas. The suggestions rolled in, again some obvious and some less so: Remarkably Bright Creatures, by Shelby Van Pelt; Migrations, by Charlotte McConaghy; The Overstory, by Richard Powers; and Birnam Wood, by Eleanor Catton, were among my favorite recommendations. I said the Fifth Season trilogy, by N.K. Jemisin — yes, it is science fiction/fantasy, but some of the best writing I’ve read in recent years, and to my mind definitely climate fiction.
I started thinking about whether these books were intended as climate allegories, or whether the moment in which they were written is just so suffused with that reality, the climate connection was more organic. I don’t know. But I like thinking about it.
TV and movies are the same way. Everything is a climate story now. My favorite show lately was Silo, based on some of my absolute favorite speculative fiction books, the Wool series by Hugh Howey. I was one of the lucky people who found Wool on Kindle, back when it was new and fresh technology, and waited desperately for Howey to upload his next installments. The books read as climate or nuclear fiction, but they felt somehow fun to me then, not so suffused with dread. The TV adaptation, starring Rebecca Ferguson (never enough, never, never; also Lady Jessica), feels different. It was more darkly like a story about climate apocalypse. I won’t spoil it — you should really just read the Wool Omnibus — but suffice to say that it has the same feeling, dread mixed with longing and nostalgia and solastalgia, that is shared by movies like Children of Men, Blade Runner: 2049, and Interstellar.
I thought about the Old Man and the Sea when we watched Avatar: The Way of Water with my 8-year-old. (OK, fine, Jake Sully’s “They killed their mother” is not exactly allegorical, but Avatar is still a climate movie.) The space whales movie tries to be a lot of things, but I kept coming back to ocean acidification and the 101 degree temperatures in the south Atlantic this summer. Is that what James Cameron wanted me to think about? The deep-sea submersible diver and HMFIC hitting me over the head with mournful whale families? It’s true that some of the greatest stories getting told are, in fact, trying to talk about climate, sometimes to give the productions greater meaning, sometimes to give voice to the feeling of living and creating right now. My friend explored this in depth in a feature in The Atlantic, which you should read.
Or maybe it’s also true that I am seeing these metaphors because my mind is primed to see them. I live in narratives, so of course I look for meaning behind them, and right now the most meaningful thing I can imagine is what we have done to this planet. Books are all about climate, movies and TV shows are all about climate, because my mind is all about climate. It is the main theme I obsess over, the future I try to imagine on behalf of my kids; climate fiction is the Baader-Meinhof phenomenon.
If, as someone once said, the aim of art is to represent not the outward appearance of things, but their inner significance, then I suppose it’s ok that I am seeing climate stories everywhere. It may be as the artists intended. It may be the meaning that I, the consumer of art, am bringing to the experience. The story gets told either way.
Sorry, Santiago. I still think you are a version of Christ. But I do wonder, if Hemingway were writing now, whether The Old Man and the Sea would be about rising seas instead.
Even at a thousand words, this picture would be way undervalued. But there it was, waiting to be taken (the picture, that is, not the object). So I took, during a visit to Florence, and I wrote, in 2014, and I redux, here, because some images you just can’t get out of your head.
The middle finger of Galileo’s right hand is a satisfying sight. Not because the resemblance to an obscene gesture is unmistakable (though that’s pretty amusing). And not because such a gesture might suggest that in the end a scientist who suffered persecution for the sin of being correct had gotten the last word—well, two words (though that would be amusing, too). And not even because the relic once belonged to the body of the real live Galileo Galilei (awesome). No, what pleased me most during my first personal encounter with the finger a few months ago was something more historically potent: its setting. Continue reading
I had never seen or heard of cypress knees before last year, when I visited Spring Grove Cemetery in Cincinnati. It’s a beautiful place to walk around. The landscape is idyllic. Grass, grass, trees, trees, pond, swans, mausoleum, leaves, tombstone, tre—what the hell are those?
Continue reading
This post ran in 2017 and the last time I looked, the Four Corners is still a Roadrunner cartoon landscape. Here, I explain, at least in part, why.
Flying through Monument Valley on the Arizona/Utah border recently, I was crammed into an old and slow Cessna 147 taildragger. Light filtered through the smoke of distant wildfires. It felt like looking through antique glass at a country of stone giants. We’d arrived at the last blink of this particular landscape, buttes shipwrecked alone in the desert, thin memories of mesas and canyons blown out by erosion.
When I posted the above photo on social media, one of the LWON writers commented that the landmarks look like volcanic necks, which are the hardened insides of volcanoes left when the rest of the land has eroded away. When I said no, this is straight sandstone erosion and not a cluster of exposed volcanic guts, she said prove it. Continue reading