Johnny and Oppie

Some smart cookie timed the release of the movie about Robert Oppenheimer to the week of the anniversary of Trinity, the first test of the first nuclear weapon. (Another smart cookie threw in the release of a Barbie movie and a notable Barbenheimer genre was born, but that’s not what this post is about right now.) Anyway. Oppenheimer’s leadership of the Manhattan Project that led to Trinity is so famous that most of us (me) forget that he also did brilliant — at least for a while — physics. This first ran August 21, 2013, Oppenheimer and Wheeler had both died already, and Dyson has died since. The comments on the original post are probably better than the post.

Physicists, like the ancient Greeks, like to gossip about their gods.  Three physicists* happened to be talking on Twitter** about a review by a fourth physicist, Freeman Dyson, of a biography of one of these gods, J. Robert Oppenheimer, and about his war with another one, John Archibald Wheeler.

Physicist #1: Oppenheimer did the breakthrough work on black holes.

Physicist #2:  Isn’t it ironic that Wheeler gets credit for inventing black holes?

Physicist #3: Dyson’s review doesn’t talk about Wheeler’s bitter rejection of Oppenheimer’s black holes and Oppenheimer’s antipathy toward Wheeler.

Physicist #2:  So interesting. Maybe Oppenheimer wasn’t accustomed to challenges?  And then Wheeler invents the phrase, “black hole”, and Oppenheimer never uses it.

Physicist #1: “. . .[the star] like the Cheshire cat, fades from view. One leaves behind only its grin, the other . . .”

Physicist #1:  “. . . only its gravitational attraction.” – John Wheeler 1967

Physicist #3:  I heard Oppenheimer sat outside the auditorium when Wheeler was giving the talk that conceded that black holes form.

Physicist #2:  I remember now, that story is in Kip Thorne’s book***.

Me: Oh my what a story!

Physicist #1:  I’d just like to 100% endorse @AnnFinkbeiner’s tracking it all down.

And off I go to find Kip Thorne’s book. And Wheeler’s autobiography.  And Dyson’s review.  And the Web of Stories online interviews.  And to fall thoroughly down the rabbit hole, where it’s dark and lonely but, you know.  Interesting.

Continue reading

In the Doorway

The end started a long time ago. I guess that’s always true in a sense. But this was years, really, even before the pandemic–for both of them, though mostly for her. As the dementia worsened and her care became more difficult, her daughters made that decision no one wants to make; the facility was nearby and they’d be able to see her and help calm and reassure her that things were as they should be. He went with her because that’s how it goes; they’d been together a long while. His presence was her lifeline for a time. We called their room “the apartment” so it seemed less awful. Even though the window looked over a grassy park, she didn’t fall for it.

She didn’t last long, anyway. Unexpectedly, he did. Has, I should say. In the physical sense, that is, despite COVID, which ravaged him then gave him (mostly) back. In the mental sense, he comes and goes: There’s a heavy door in his mind that creaks open now and then and he takes a step through, then turns back, unsure which way to go. It’s scary on both sides, familiar but also not. He’s caught in between, grabbing at this from one room and that from the other and trying to piece them together. Nothing quite fits.

Continue reading

The Melody of the Mountain

This past weekend, I climbed Glacier Peak with a friend of mine. Glacier Peak is Washington’s fourth-highest mountain, and also one of the state’s five stratovolcanoes. (Perhaps you’ve heard of one of the others; I know I have.) What distinguishes Glacier Peak among its volcanic kin is its remoteness. It is at the eastern edge of Snohomish County, and you can’t see it from any of the major highways and byways unless you really know where to look. Also, the approach to the start of the standard climbing route is at least twelve miles long, depending on where you set up your high camp. Some of this hike is through lovely cool evergreen forest, and some of it is through lovely open alpine meadows, but a lot of it is just up up up a series of unrelenting switchbacks. Then, of course, there is the climb itself: five miles and four thousand feet of glacier and mountain until you reach the summit.

All of which is to say that, for me, there is a fair amount of slow trudging. I wish I could claim this gave me a chance to savor the sights, sounds, and smells of the various habitats I trudged through. Instead, when I trudge, my mind inevitably finds a musical figure to play over and over and over, so that my steps can serve as a metronome, since they are, after all, already ploddingly metronomic.

I trained as a classical pianist when I was younger, and for the longest time the piece I turned to for extended trudges was Beethoven’s 32 Variations in C minor. The theme, just eight measures long, is a haughty melody over stern chords that descend a chromatic scale, but the first three variations are comparatively light and quick, as those chords are arpeggiated with repeated notes and then exchanged between the hands. These variations could accommodate a range of walking speeds, my steps falling on various beats as the needs of my heart and lungs dictated.  

Beethoven served me well on hikes and climbs and treks for years. But I’m older now, and slower, so for Glacier Peak my mind added a new piece to its repertoire: J.S. Bach’s Prelude in F minor from Book I of The Well-Tempered Clavier. I was primed, having just started learning the piece a couple of weeks before after hearing it on a commercial or podcast or something. But it suited the trip well: it is slow, smooth, and somewhat plaintive, while also, in its way, relentless, an exercise in quiet perpetual motion. Playing it, you never really get a chance to stop and collect yourself; Bach is always asking one hand or the other to keep the steady pace of sixteenth notes. Oh, you might pause slightly, bring some thought to its conclusion, but by then the next phrase has already begun. One writer described the piece as having an “awe-inspiring sense of inevitability.” Maybe there’s a metaphor in that, or maybe it’s the elevation getting to me, but the notes keep moving, and moving, the tension building, breathless almost, until, before you know it, there you are, at that loveliest of closes: the Picardy third. And the view isn’t bad, either.

Photos by the author

There are Two Kinds of People: Those Who Make Their Beds and Those Who Don’t

I was at the pharmacy the other day, waiting for my flu shot, when I spotted a book called Make Your Bed: Little Things That Can Change Your Life…And Maybe the World. It was written by a retired U.S. Navy Admiral. In his tongue in cheek synopsis of the book at the GuardianJohn Crace explains that the admiral learned about the importance of bed-making during Naval SEAL training camp:

Every morning, we would have to make our beds. If the task wasn’t done properly, we would be sent on a 10-mile run. Making my bed taught me the importance of getting my day off to a good start. Years later, when we finally captured Saddam Hussein in Iraq, I was intrigued to notice that he had never made his bed. It’s that kind of laziness that can lead to the downfall of any dictator.

Which is exactly the kind of thing that a bed-maker would say. As if folding sheets and positioning pillows could impose order and predictability on a chaotic, uncertain world.

There are two kinds of people in this world: those who get up every morning and make their beds, and the people who don’t bother. In case it’s not obvious yet, I’m one of the latter.

It didn’t occur to me that bed-making was such a telling detail about a person until I noticed that my friend Rosemerry’s bed is always perfectly made. I asked her if she made her bed every day, and she confirmed that she does. I confided that I never make my bed. (Technically it’s not just my bed or hers. We both have spouses who share our beds, but they follow our habits.)

Rosemerry also has a tidy desk and a tidy closet and a tidy house. I asked her why she makes her bed and she said that her parents trained her to do it in second grade by promising to get her the canopy bed she coveted if she would make her bed every day for 30 days. “After that, I always made my bed,” she said. “I like the way it makes the room feel neat.” Living in an efficiency apartment during grad school reinforced the habit — she hated having an unmade bed in the middle of her living space. Now, she said, “I think it marks the end of the night and the beginning of the day. It’s a ritual. Symbolic. Let’s do this!”

I understand the benefits of having a morning ritual, but mine — a walk up the hill with my husband and our dog — feels a lot more useful and productive. My walk gets my heart pumping, helps me clear my head and connects me to my loved ones and my place. Making a bed, on the other hand, feels like a useless task.

What’s the point? My bed is used for three thing: sleeping, sex and sorting/folding clean laundry. A made bed is unwelcoming to the first two tasks, and for the third, I simply throw the comforter into a position that provides ample space for the laundry pile and it’s all good.

Admiral Bed-Maker argues that making your bed isn’t pointless. It means that by the time you leave your bedroom in the morning “you will have accomplished the first task of the day.’’ And that, he said, “will give you a small sense of pride, and it will encourage you to do another task, and another, and another.” By the end of the day, he said, “that one task completed will have turned into many tasks completed.”

To which I say, well, maybe that’s how it feels if you’re a bed-making type. If you’re like me, doing a bunch of tasks first thing just makes you feel justified in slacking off later in the day. What I notice when I go running before work is that I start the day with a great sense of accomplishment. I’m also a little tired and I feel entitled to take an early lunch. I’m not sure my overall day becomes any more productive. I do think I eat more snacks.

As a non-bed-maker, I have some science on my side, though I’ll admit it’s not conclusive. A 2001 paper titled, “The well-made bed: an unappreciated public health risk,” highlights “the hazardous habit of bed-making, pandemic in North America. Not only is this recently evolved practice unhygienic, the mechanics of straightening the corners and fluffing the pillows is physically injurious and adversely affects the mental well-being of our population,” the authors write. “A well-made bed is a fertile breeding ground for bacteria, fungi and other vermin.”

Yes, they’re being jokey about the dangers of pathogens like “Strip Bucknakedus” and injuries like “sheet turner’s wrist,” but an actual study from researchers at the Kingston University concluded that dust mites (which can provoke allergies) cannot survive in the dry conditions found in an unmade bed. “Leaving a bed unmade during the day can remove moisture from the sheets and mattress so the mites will dehydrate and eventually die,” study author Stephen Pretlove told the BBC.

Some researchers have dismissed the dust mite study’s conclusions, saying that many houses may have enough humidity to host the mites, whether or not the bed is made. Also on the pro bed-making side: a series of studies suggesting that meaningless rituals (like performing a series of random gestures) might help people increase their feelings of self-discipline. Cool, if you’re into that.

The internet is full of discussions about the merits of a bed-making habit, and what I see when I read them is that the purported benefits of making the bed appeal to people who derive a sense of agency and comfort by imposing some kind of order in their lives. And the reasons to skip making the bed convince the people who accept that the world is full of chaos and who don’t value order for order’s sake. I’m not convinced that bed-making can turn one kind of person into another.

________

This post first ran on  November 12, 2018.

Snapshot: Overthinking lawn decor

In June I spent a few days in the suburbs just east of Oceanside, California. (I actually just dedicated five minutes to figuring out whether it was actually Oceanside or Carlsbad, or Encintas, or Lake San Marcos, but we stayed in a nondescript chain hotel — a Hampton Inn? a Holiday Inn? a Marriott? — and all I remembered was that it was next to a Home Depot, of which there are also a zillion, so I gave up on searching.) Everything around us was connected by perfectly paved four- to six-lane roads, with few sidewalks and no pedestrians. One morning I’d gotten up at 5am and decided to take a walk, and the only option I could identify was a little neighborhood right across the street from the hotel. I walked up the hill, savoring the quiet and appreciating the plants we don’t have up here in Seattle: birds of paradise, palms, succulents galore. The houses were enormous and mostly looked the same; I expected the interiors to look something like the inside of a Cheesecake Factory. There were Mercedes and BMWs in the driveways.

I saw this sign in a garden alongside echeveria and aloe. I’ve heard the platitude before, I could not stop thinking about it.

Continue reading

The Trifecta, Or, How to Haunt Yourself for Years to Come

Black and white photo of a bedsheet ghost standing outside in the grass. The person is small, and their white sneakers can be seen. They are glowing faintly.

In 2016 my editor assigned me an article about a then-recently identified genetic association between three medical conditions: postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), hypermobile Ehlers Danlos syndrome (hEDS), and mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS).

As it so happens, I have all three of these. After minimal reflection, I decided to take a journalistic risk and write the story in the first person, including some information about my own illness experience. I talked about my bizarre sunlight allergy and joint dislocations, and the stress of not knowing when my immune system will detonate next.

I talked, too, about how the three conditions often come as a box set: people who have one of them are more likely to also have the others. In my article, I called this comorbid trio “the trifecta”— just my flippant way of emphasizing their interrelatedness.

Seven years have passed. In that time, scientific knowledge of all three conditions has advanced, albeit not as much as I’d like. My symptoms and daily experience have shifted, as has my relationship to my body. The way I talk about my illness—including whether I talk about my illness—has changed. I’m not embarrassed by the 2016 article, exactly, but if I were to write it today, I’d approach it very differently. “Still, what’s done is done,” I would say. Ordinarily.

But this damn article just will not rest.

Continue reading

Small Rhythms

My 16-year-old is leaving alone for a month of language school in Tokyo. Being born and raised outside of towns under population 700, closer to 300 in some cases, should put a dizzying spin on the experience. We’ve had epic urban adventures together, but not off this continent, certainly not in the vast compression of Tokyo. Send up a good thought for the kid because I’m understandably nervous. Meanwhile, I’m absolutely assured that they’ve got this.

I have three pieces of advice. You’ll be traveling solo, so double your wits about you. If you’re curious about something, if it draws your eye, explore farther. And, find small rhythms.

The latter is my joy. Helen Fields wrote about it for LWON last week with her sidewalk mulberries.

I advise that whatever rhythms you chance into, take note, brushing teeth at a wash basin before bed, sending out a text from the same place (to your dad), leaving the host family door and turning left (or right) to walk into the city. Every day you’ll spot the same odd street sign, blast of graffiti, or a constellation of gum stains on the sidewalk. Nod to them as you pass. Begin to detect the cadence in the encounters you have.

Continue reading

An adventurous reunion

My best friend lives in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. Despite meeting her over Zoom every Saturday since 2018, I’ve only seen her in person a handful of times. So when she came to visit me this Spring we decided to do something deeply silly to celebrate. Ottawa is not known for its high sophistication, but we do, apparently, have a restaurant that serves 44-course dinners. The four-hour seating sounded perfect for a thorough catch-up.

I’ve walked past Atelier nearly every day for years thinking it was a condemned house. It’s just across from the Booth Street complex, the old Canadian government geology district that is being razed, and it had a grated window, no sign, and kind of a rusty staircase railing. Rough-blasted boulders form the yard. You have to know it’s there, is what I’m saying.

Continue reading