Orb Weaver

Image from “American spiders and their spinning work. A natural history of the orbweaving spiders of the United States, with special regard to their industry and habits” (1889)

My garden has a guardian, an enormous black-and-yellow orb spider. I look for her every morning when I enter the enclosure we built last spring, to keep the deer out and create a protected spot for Calliope to bask in the sun and chase lizards.

She’s mostly blind, this spider. But she can sense me coming. I used to barge into the garden without thinking, swinging open the gate before I realized she’d used it as an anchor. She never fell or swung loose. By the time I spotted her or the remnants of her web, now in tatters, she’d usually retreated to a high spot on the fence.

They say spiders are capable of learning, planning, surprise. Do they also feel resentment?

Continue reading

Drama at the beach

Horseshoe crab with loop of tracks behind it

I’m at the beach (the beach!) and it’s September, and there was a storm recently, so things have been quite chilly and windy and sploshy. Monday morning, I went out for a walk before starting my day of remote work, and I saw this horseshoe crab, and it was moving.

I am told by the friend whose beach house this is that her relatives are thrilled to hear a report of a moving horseshoe crab. Most of the horseshoe crabs they’ve seen in these parts are just bits, like a piece of shell or that tail-thing that sticks out behind, or if they’re whole, they’re dead or mostly dead.

This horseshoe crab was very much not dead.

Horseshoe crab with fresh tracks

This horseshoe crab was chugging along. I took a video and, while I could probably upload it here, I am writing this on an inconvenient device at a beach house, so I will instead direct you to the link at YouTube: Drama at the Beach.

If you know two facts about horseshoe crabs, they are probably (1) that their blood is used in pharmaceutical manufacturing and (2) they are “living fossils” – there were horseshoe crabs 445 million years ago. So long ago.

So I suppose horseshoe crabs have been doing this sort of thing basically forever, since before there were dinosaurs. Thanks for letting me hang out for a few minutes of the journey, friend.

Cameron wrote a book!

Cameron’s new children’s book, National Monuments of the USA, hadn’t gone to print when she and I met up for tea at the annual science writers conference in Memphis last October. She was still fact-checking and finalizing, and having a (tiny!)(Cameron: big!) freakout about how the book would be received.

To teach history to children isn’t easy, ever. When I read Cameron’s book I understood what a challenge she’d accepted. How to celebrate what’s inspiring and beautiful about America, without blotting out the painful truths many monuments were built to commemorate? We talked about that and other things, now that the book is out and the reviews are in.

Emily: Cameron, how’d this project come about?

Cameron: So my friend Kate Siber, who I met working at Outside magazine many years ago, had done a book about the national parks that has the same wonderful illustrator, Chris Turnham, which had the same format: an introduction, full spreads with illustrations of a selection of the parks, and short write-ups about things to see and do in each park. She had done a few books for the same publisher, and she gave them my name. (Thank you, Kate!)

I learned a lot from this book. There were places I’ve never heard of, especially on the East Coast. Growing up in California — I don’t know what your history and civics education was like — but mine was very, ahem, local. 

I feel the same. You probably went to California missions in fourth grade, or things like that? I did, too. 

Yes, we made Spanish colonial missions out of sugar cubes. It was weird. Did you visit monuments as part of the writing process? Or was it mostly reported from afar?

A lot of it was reported from afar, because when I started doing the reporting a lot of the monuments were still closed or hard to get to. Once some of the travel restrictions were lifted, I thought, this will be perfect: My kids are being homeschooled, basically. Why don’t we rent an RV and go on a road trip for six months? But as the pandemic continued, I realized, no, my kids really need to be at home and have a steady routine, and I do, too. (Also: renting an RV is expensive!). So we didn’t have our full pandemic road trip, but we did take a short pandemic road trip to see six or seven monuments. We also saw a couple in California on other trips, and I had been to several of the national monuments elsewhere in the past. 

Were you talking to the boys about it as you wrote the book? Did they have feedback?

Yeah, they did. They had strong feedback about what they liked and what they didn’t like. And by the end of our road trip, it was like, “Mom, do we really have to go to see another monument?”

I remember talking with one of the boys about Tule Lake National Monument, because he was studying World War II and Japanese incarceration in his history class. I was really having trouble with what language to use [for the camps where Japanese Americans were imprisoned]. We often call them internment camps, but I guess that’s really not correct. Internment camps are for foreign nationals, but most of the people in these camps were U.S. citizens.

These were concentration camps. FDR even said that in memos, his staff said that in memos. But there’s so much feeling about the word “concentration camp” connected with the Holocaust that I wasn’t quite sure what to do. I wanted to use the real word, but also, I didn’t want to stop people in their tracks and have them stop reading and not learn more about Tule Lake because they’re so disturbed by calling these places “concentration camps.” So I was talking to my son about it for a while, and he really got what I was struggling with. At one point, I said, “What if I said they were imprisoned in these camps?” And he thought that was a good solution–saying what was actually happening there. 

So that’s what I ended up doing. I also sent the text to a Japanese-American history organization and to the ranger at the site, and so I had background on the camps from them, too, and a sensitivity reader looked at the whole book toward the end of the process. And it was also really great to talk with my son to get the perspective of a kid who’d be reading this.

Continue reading

Finding the Beauty in Roadkill

Amanda Stronza found the cardinal dead on a Texas highway this June, a splash of vermillion against drab asphalt. He’d been struck by a car—a common fate for birds, as many as 340 million of whom are killed by vehicles in the United States every year. Most drivers overlook these casualties, but not Stronza, an environmental anthropologist at Texas A&M University. She scooped up the cardinal and conveyed him to a quiet place, where she laid him atop moss and covered him with flowers. “His little body weighed nothing…” she wrote when she posted a photo of the bright, tasteful tableau on Instagram. “I’m sorry, beautiful one.”

The paradox of roadkill is that it’s at once conspicuous and invisible: Our highways are lined with so many crushed raccoons and pulverized opossums that we hardly notice them. Stronza’s artistic mission is to make us see the wild deaths humans both inflict and ignore. I first stumbled upon Stronza’s roadkill photography while researching my book Crossings, and was struck by how her unflinching portraits negotiate the difficult balance of celebrating animal lives while lamenting their deaths. “It’s like serving as a witness, or giving a eulogy,” Stronza told me recently. “In that way, I hope that we can be more sensitive to the lives of the animals who share our communities with us.”

Stronza began memorializing animals in 2019, when she found a dead squirrel in downtown Austin. “What struck me in that moment were all the people just streaming past that animal, like she was nothing,” Stronza recalled. She encircled the squirrel with flowers and pinecones, snapped a photo, and published her impromptu tribute on social media, where it went viral. She’s since created memorials for dozens of creatures, including porcupines, skunks, coyotes, turtles, armadillos, and snakes. In the Kalahari Desert this summer, she commemorated a honey badger; in Nepal, she memorialized a langur. She covers wounds with flowers and rocks—not to airbrush death, but to maintain her subjects’ dignity, a practice and ethic that reminds me of the care morticians take in preparing human bodies for open-casket funerals. “I’m always looking for beauty,” she said.

Continue reading

Outright Gifts

This first ran Sept. 22, 2010 — the same time of year as now. It’s not clear that the auction is still going on, and maybe it’s been replaced by a 5K race, and maybe by a bunch of other auctions in different places. The clinic is building a new home and has a lot more staff and treat even more diseases. Holmes and Caroline Morton have certainly retired and you know what? things change and sometimes they get better. Though this was pretty good to begin with, splendid even.

I drove up to an auction in the Pennsylvania hayfields, parked in the field to the left because the lot to the right was reserved for buggies and horses. Maybe five auctions were going on in different parts of the fairground and everywhere were Amish in black and dark jewel-colored clothes, Mennonites in black and light sprigged cottons, all the old Anabaptist sects, the people that locals call “plain folk.”  They spoke a dialect of German you couldn’t understand even if you understand German. They had no-shit faces, meaning they don’t hand it out but if you do, then that’s the kind of person you are.

Kids were quietly all over the place, and a surprising number of them were in wheelchairs – plain peoples’ kids are unusually likely to have genetic diseases that interfere with the way their bodies process proteins, which in turn plays havoc with the parts of their brains that control muscles. The auctions were to raise money for the clinic that treats them, The Clinic For Special Children, which is what the plain people call these kids, God’s special children. The clinic supplies these people who have no telephones, no cars, no electric stoves, no electric lights with what was at the time the only true personalized genetic medicine in the country.

The clinic was started by Holmes Morton, a West Virginia boy who dropped out of high school, talked his way into college, got interested in pediatric neurology, wound up at Harvard Medical School. He worked at a children’s hospital in Philadelphia where he analyzed a case of glutaric aciduria, a disease in which the child is normal at birth, is healthy for months, then one morning gets some common virus and by afternoon, can’t walk, and in the worst cases, can’t sit, talk, or swallow. Abrupt onset like that is the hallmark of a treatable disease, so Morton decided to go out to Pennsylvania Dutch country and meet the family.  In fact, he met a lot of other families with a lot of similar problems, and because he thought glutaric aciduria might be not only treatable but preventable, he wrote a proposal to the National Institutes of Health. He got turned down. So at age 38, he decided to open his own clinic, though he doesn’t remember deciding anything except that the kids needed help. The Wall Street Journal wrote an article about him, and money and lab equipment appeared as if by magic. In November of 1989, the plain people raised the clinic in one rainy day, because that’s how they do things, fast and all together.

The clinic equipment eventually included a genetic sequencing machine, and Morton hired a geneticist. Now during childbirths, which are generally at home, the midwife takes a sample of amniotic fluid and has it couriered to the clinic to be tested for genetic disorders; sometimes the baby hasn’t even been born yet. Babies with genes for a disorder spend the first two years of their lives on special diets and don’t get sick. Kids with less-treatable diseases are tested in the clinic, and though they don’t recover, they don’t get worse. The tests cost a tenth what they would in a commercial lab, results are back in a half hour, and the kids are treated before they leave the office.  The clinic buys its own diagnostic equipment and charges nominal fees; it buys medication wholesale and charges retail.  It’s a model of health care, says Morton’s wife Caroline, the daughter of a country doctor who works in the clinic, “that’s very old.”

The plain people came from a dozen couples who immigrated in the 1700’s, and though they don’t marry cousins, they also don’t marry outside the church.   So a mutation on a gene in one of those dozen couples now runs through a population. Maybe 7,000 people are at the auction. The clinic’s budget is around $1 million a year, and the auction raises a third of it. Everything being auctioned – food, crafts, farm equipment, motor oil, toys, handmade furniture – has been donated outright. A quilt can have 5,000 pieces and take a year to handsew, and during this year’s auction, next year’s quilt was being started.  The quilts are art.  They could be sold commercially for between $1000 and $3000.  And they’re given outright.

I bought a tiny quilt, a wall-hanging really, the Amish dark jewel colors. I heard how much the auction brought in and forget the exact amount but a lot. And back in Baltimore, my life is full of intense people doing interesting things, but that auction was a little disconcerting.  It was also full of intense people but the things they do, the outright gifts, go way beyond interesting.

Credits:  Photos all by, and used with the kind permission of, Mary Caperton Morton.  Holmes Morton is her father.  Much of the information was lifted wholesale from her story, here and here.

Leaving/Imprints

Mom spreads maps over the dining room table. They’re oldish, not ancient, but the home I see in them is not the home I know. They are all of Colorado—mostly cities at the nexus of Rocky Mountains and High Plains, 40, 50, 60 years ago. The outpost of Ward, a funky old mining town up a sinuous dry canyon, guarded by two guys with broadswords. The hopping university town of Fort Collins, then just a smallish scatter of purple squares along a tidy grid of streets. And there’s Boulder in 1957, my hometown, where I’m visiting my family for the turn of the New Year.

We press the map folds flat with our fingers and lean closer. The city then was a tiny yolk at the core of its current footprint, pressed hard against the mountains. The mesa where my parents live formed its eastward boundary, a new neighborhood then, not yet swallowed and sprawled miles beyond with malls and business parks and subdivisions and natural gas wells, the fingers of the city and its neighbors creeping outward over the plains, grasping each other to form an amoeba of light and noise that pulses with traffic along a vasculature of roads. A place forever swallowing itself. Becoming new and new again, without becoming better.

Every time I come back, I grumble about how much things have changed since I was a kid. For all my sharp words, though, there’s something unchanging here. It rises in me when I see the rolling ponderosa-covered waves of the foothills breaking on the snowy, treeless slopes of the high Rockies to the west, when I see the plains reaching boundlessly east, haloed pink at the days’ two turns, from and towards darkness.

Continue reading

Regarding INC5760131 or How to Navigate the Reply-All Apocalypse

It began with a software engineer in India. The man’s email signature says that he works in “Dreams Sustainment (Offshore).” His note with the subject line “Regarding INC5760131” referred to some technical issue that was virtually incomprehensible to anyone who was not among the email’s intended recipients. And there were a lot of unintended recipients. Somehow this poor guy managed to copy everyone working in ESPN content.

That’s a lot of people. ESPN employs about 8,000 people worldwide, and during a single short burst that morning, his misdirected email spawned something like 138 replies. I know this, because I worked for ESPN and was on the receiving end of the email tsunami.

The NC5760131 fiasco was no isolated incident. In 2012, an NYU student accidentally sent a query about his tuition payment to 39,979 other studentsTime Inc and Reuters have also suffered reply-all incidents, but these incidents are nothing compared to a test message sent to UK’s National Health Service’s 1.2 million members, which created a deluge of emails so big that it crashed the system.

“Regarding NC5760131” wasn’t my first involuntary ride on a reply-all train. Not long before that email thread clogged my inbox, I found myself copied on an email thread about Kay’s hip surgery. I still don’t know who Kay is, but it seemed that her surgery had gone well, and the other 28 people on the thread were eager to congratulate her. I would have just deleted these emails and set up a filter to send them directly to spam, but once I started reading these notes, I couldn’t stop.

Over the course of Kay’s long email thread, I listened to a member of the group agonize over whether to return home (wherever that was) after a stint in Australia. I also received news of Tom’s tragic and untimely death. I read heart-felt memories about Tom and his friends, and it felt something like dropping into a soap opera a few episodes into season two. Eventually I surmised that this group of women had been high school classmates. I couldn’t bear to tell them that they had accidentally invited a voyeur into their midst. But I also knew that asking them to take me off their list was likely to just spark even more emails.

Which gets me to my Ann Landers question. What do you do when someone erroneously copies you on an email thread? The answer is simple. Don’t engage. A concise New York Times Q&A from 2016 was published with the headline “When I’m Mistakenly Put on an Email Chain, Should I Hit ‘Reply All’ Asking to Be Removed?” The one word answer? No.

It’s not the content of the email (in most cases) that makes a reply-all thread so annoying, it’s that it exists at all. Which is why replying only amplifies the awfulness. The best thing you can do in response to a reply-all thread is nothing. Let the damn thing die.

If only people would. Consider the NC5760131 thread. I put 136 of the emails (the ones that my spam filter didn’t eat) into a spreadsheet to analyze how the thread played out.

The first replies were earnest. “I think you added me to this email thread by mistake,” someone wrote. Within minutes, a new meme emerged. “Sorry, wrong [David or Karen or Chris]” replied some of the first responders. (“Wrong [insert name here]” became an ongoing joke as the thread expanded.)

Here’s my rough count of the overall responses. (They add up to a few more than 136, because some replies fell into multiple categories.)

48 jokes about the thread

31 requests to unsubscribe from the email chain

19 replies reveling in the absurdity of the reply-all thread

17 emails explaining the problem (“I think it’s obvious we were all accidentally attached to the email”)

14 replies saying “you’ve got the wrong [insert name here]”

10 photo memes (for instance, a photo of Michael Jackson eating popcorn with the words “I just came here to read the comments.”)

8 instructions: here’s what to do and how to stop replying to all. (“Please don’t reply all,” one person wrote, adding a long, detailed explanation.)

6 desperate attempts to make the emails stop, with exclamation points, all caps or other cries for help (STOP REPLYING ALL!!!, one person wrote.)

As you can see, the jokes outnumbered the earnest replies, and this was especially true as time went on and the LOL replies eclipsed the serious ones. Early in the thread, which lasted less than two hours, someone sent this plea:

PLEASE…it was a mistake…there are thousands of people on this email by accident…PLEASE don’t everyone reply all…let’s end the madness now before it starts!!

I chuckled when I read that. How naive to believe that such madness can be stopped. Once something’s on the internet, it takes on a life of its own. As the NC5760131 emails continued, they became more and more light-hearted. “I just wanted to inform the group that a hot dog is 100% a sandwich,” wrote one guy. Of course there were GIFs, and it was probably inevitable that someone posted a photo of The Dress. Sub-threads developed, with people making pitches for their favorite sports team (“Let’s go Mets!”) and ridiculous self-promotion (“Now would be a great time for all of you to take advantage of ESPN The Magazines discount for employees, friends and family.”) One guy even attached his resume, perhaps hoping to upgrade his job.

The thread eventually ended when someone from corporate intervened to block the thread. But don’t tell that to the guy who sent the last reply. His earnest note explained what was happening and asked “Please use this tool (email) in a responsible way.” He probably thinks it worked.

___

This post first ran on April 25, 2018.

Music in the Air

I had a conversation with an owl the other night. It was a barred owl, a pretty common species in the woods around our cabin in central Virginia. The bird got going early—well before dusk—and I happened to be outside with my native wooden flute (purchased from this lovely flutemaker in Canada), so I found similar notes and replied in the same pattern. There was a pause while cicadas and crickets took a turn. Then, the owl again. Four quick hoots, repeated twice, the final one dropping off into a guttural drag. I waited a few beats, lets the insects hum some more, then played again, the eight notes. Seconds passed. Then, the owl.

Barred owls aren’t just one-note birds: They have a variety of calls, more than a dozen by some counts, including one that you’d swear came from a monkey. But this was the one people like to say sounds like “Who cooks for you? Who cooks for you all?” (I’m not sold on that comparison, but it endures.)

It’s very possible, likely, even, that my flute playing had nothing to do with the owl’s decision to keep hooting. In my experience these owls will repeat the sequence at least a few times over a couple of minutes, regardless of any back talk. But I like to think we were conversing. There’s something magical about hearing a wild animal respond to you the way he would to his own kind, as if what you said was meaningful enough in his language to warrant a reply.

If barred owls weren’t so vocal, I wouldn’t know for sure they were around. Only once did I spy one, barely, as I pointed my flashlight beam into the big oak where a call seemed to be coming from. It was fully dark, but I glimpsed the bird’s eyeshine before he swooped toward me and then away, over my head. (A little anatomy: An owl’s eyes are super reflective, having an extra layer called the tapetum lucidum that snags light passing through the retina and bounces it back to what are already very sensitive rods.) The swoop was almost silent; I felt it more than heard it. Which is the owl’s way: The structure and texture of the wing feathers lets them funnel air very quietly by breaking up the turbulence that would otherwise whoosh.

But it was the calls moving through the air more than the bird’s anatomy that interested me that night. I thought about how the animal’s vocalizations in a sense fill a niche much as the physical animal does. It’s a more temporary residency, but still. I had the same notion some months before while lying in my tent in a rainforest in Borneo. I was listening, on my first night there, to the delightfully unfamiliar calls of wild things coming awake just before dawn. As cricket chirps were topped by a bird’s song that gave way to monkey chatter, I envisioned the soundscape in 3D with each unique noise—with its own pitch and volume and frequency—rushing in to inhabit an empty spot, standing tall to make itself known—ta da!–and then vacating just as quickly. Picture Tom Cruise in Minority Report flinging bits of data around in space with his finger…sliding this bit over, that one up, another one off screen, a new one in to replace it. That’s sort of how I saw it.

So, I think of animals as competing not just for a physical niche but for an aural one as well—a slot in the soundspace not yet taken that they can fill with chatter and alarms and music and be heard despite the din. It’s another way to make oneself known in a crowd. The variety makes it all possible: An elephant sending low-frequency rumbles through the Earth reaches her intended even as lions roar and cicadas scream. Like a lioness intent on spotting the weakest gazelle in the herd, an animal can hear a familiar voice and a known language rising above all others.

I don’t know that this is a terribly profound notion, but conversing with the owl, I realized that my flute toots were taking up one tiny pocket of aural space, filling that sound niche just for a moment, then flitting offscreen, leaving that spot vacant for the owl’s reply. Profound or no, it was kind of a neat way to think about it.

–Photo by Joshua J. Cotten on Unsplash