Storyteller’s Remorse

Wolf pups feeding on a musk oxen carcass on Ellesmere Island, Nunavut, Canada. Neil Shea.


In late August 2018 I traveled to the northernmost island in Canada to observe white wolves. These were an extremely unusual group of animals, and they had the distinction of being unafraid of humans. This alone was something, but beyond their fearlessness lay a subtler behavior that is perhaps best described as tolerance. Another way to put it is that the wolves of Ellesmere Island allowed humans to get close—really close. Up there it was possible to see into the marvelous, mysterious, and mundane details of their everyday lives. 

If it isn’t immediately clear why this is extraordinary, consider that everywhere else on earth wolves flee at sight or scent of humans. This is so broadly true as to be nearly a natural law (though there are, always, some exceptions), and one consequence, for scientists, has been that it’s very difficult to study the animals. The wolves of Ellesmere, then, offered something so radically different that they were bound to attract attention.

By the time I arrived on Ellesmere, the wolves were well-known among a small group of researchers, filmmakers, and photographers, most of them professionals attached in one way or another with universities or organizations that could help carry the enormous costs incurred while working more than a thousand roadless miles north of the tree line. Distance, in other words, was a gatekeeper, just as Arctic cold was a foil. All this is to say that not many people visited the wolves. The small staff of a government weather station rotated in and out of their territory every few months, but they largely left the wolves alone. Between the late 1980s and the mid-2010s, a biologist named L. David Mech traveled to Ellesmere each summer to study them. And now and then a photographer or film crew would arrive to document the wolves. By way of comparison, 3 to 4 million visitors flock to Yellowstone National Park every year. Many, if not most, go hoping for a glimpse of a wolf.

———

I had gone north to join a crew of three National Geographic filmmakers who’d spent the summer on the island. For two weeks we followed a family of nine wolves across the tundra. They were four adults, one yearling, and four pups only a few months old. Most of the time they moved so swiftly that we couldn’t keep up on foot, and so were compelled to trail them on ATVs.

We watched them play, nap, wrestle. We watched them hunt enormous musk oxen, streaking between the stampeding hooves like white lighting. At times the wolves drew so near to us that we could smell the blood in their fur, hear their stomachs whingeing in hunger. They were never aggressive, though they often tested us, playfully, by stealing things—gloves, bits of gear. During one prolonged encounter, where it was just me and the wolves together under the enormous sky, the adults made an unusual choice. They walked off to go hunting, leaving me alone with the pups. I don’t know what they were thinking, but over many years I have come to interpret it as an act of trust so powerful that it temporarily dissolved the boundary between our worlds. I still think of that moment, and wonder at its meaning, every day. 

Months later, when I turned in the story I’d written about the experience to my editor at National Geographic, I felt strangely uneasy. The editorial process at the magazine is slow, sometimes onerous. There were tweaks to the text, a layout was assembled with photographs and a map. Captions were written, facts checked, experts consulted. During all this the feeling of weirdness grew. On the surface, none of my work seemed unusual. I’ve been a journalist for many years and I knew what to expect. Often the period before a story goes to press is one of happy expectation, even a rising thrill that comes with finally sharing something you’ve worked on for a long time.

This was different. The strange feeling lingered and for a while grew louder, but eventually my life moved on. I got busy with other projects, absorbed in the adventures of my young children. About a year later, just before the wolf story was published, the feeling resurfaced and now I understood it as dread. I understood that I was about to betray the wolves.

———

Writing and sharing stories about anything is usually an act of both extraction and betrayal, no matter how well-intentioned. Journalists like me show up in a place, gather material and interview people, take notes, take photographs, take stock. We take and take and obscure ourselves behind a professional veneer. Then, days or months or perhaps years afterward, we assemble what we hoarded into some kind of narrative. Whatever stories we produce are far less complex and beautiful than the reality of life we observed. But, because life is messy, stories tend to be better organized. Stories give form to the world. They make subjects seem knowable and characters approachable. They make journeys appear repeatable. In some cases, stories read like an invitation.

I was about to invite tens of thousands of people into the intimate world of wolves. I’d even helped create a map showing exactly where they lived, and how one might get there. On the eve of publication I couldn’t sleep. I felt like I was spilling an enormous secret. I racked my brain for things I might do, some sabotage I could deploy that would stop the story from escaping into the world. And of course I knew it was far too late for that.

The first email arrived a few months later. The sender claimed to represent a wealthy European client who wanted to travel to Ellesmere Island to see wolves. Would I be willing to help, perhaps to join? The scent of money was surprisingly strong. I wanted to see the wolves again, but I didn’t have the means to do it on my own. What if? Wouldn’t it be worth it, to be once more in their company? I recoiled in horror at my own reaction and deleted the email. 

But others followed. They were mostly sent by people who seemed to mean well, who just wanted some help figuring out how to see wolves up close. I ignored them all. I told myself I was helping to keep the wolves safe, shielded from tourists and from the kind of pedestrian curiosity that would surely turn bad. But what’s also true is that these people wanted only to do what I had done, and see the things I had told them of. No matter what pretense I hid behind, I knew one of them would eventually find a way.

———

A couple of weeks ago another email landed in my inbox. This one wasn’t from a person but a Google alert I’d set up long ago on the subject of Arctic wolves. It contained a link to a TikTok video that had been viewed 25 million times. In the video a person lies belly down on snow-swept ice. He holds a camera and his hands are bare, though it’s obviously very cold. A pair of wolves approaches him. One of them sniffs at the man’s boot while the other pauses in front of the camera. It’s almost as though this wolf knows what’s expected. He drops to the ice right in front of the lens and rubs his cheek through snow, like a dog rolling in scent. It’s such an endearing moment, and it unfolds so close to the camera that you instantly wonder what the photographer captured. 

Probably his images are out there, on Instagram or the web, but I couldn’t quite bring myself to look. Instead I searched for the company that had helped guide the photographer into that encounter. From what I could gather it’s a small operation, run by an Indigenous outfitter. He and some colleagues began bringing people north to look for wolves sometime in the early 2020s, which is to say a year or two after my wolf article was published and more than 30 after the first scientist began studying the wolves. I don’t meant to suggest that my story anything to do with the birth of this Inuit-owned business. I do believe, though, that my work was one more stone tossed into a rusty pail. Finally it, seems, the pail’s full and the bottom’s blown out. 

If you search a little further into all this you, away from the outfitter himself, you find more trips advertised by other guides, each of them specifically aimed at finding wolves. There are two trips coming up in  April, another in May. I have no idea how much they cost, or where precisely they will go. What I know is that you must hurry. Most of the spots are booked. Time is running out.

Write like you’re in the 1500s

This post originally appeared six years ago, before AI further challenged the societal value assigned to personal erudition. But Leonardo remains a guiding light for me, as for so many others.

  • Describe the tongue of the woodpecker
  • Ask Benedetto Portinari how they walk on ice in Flanders
  • Describe the beginning of a human when it is in the womb
  • Ask Maestro Antonio how mortars are positioned on bastions by day or night
  • Which nerve causes the eye to move so that the motion of one eye moves the other?
  • Get a master of hydraulics to tell you how to repair a lock, canal and mill in the Lombard manner
  • Get the master of arithmetic to show you how to square a triangle
  • Ask Giannino the Bombardier about how the tower of Ferrara is walled
  • Get the measurement of the sun promised me by Maestro Giovanni Francese, the Frenchman
  • Draw Milan

The daily to-do lists and life of Leonardo Da Vinci have much to teach a science communicator like me.

Continue reading

Five Pieces of Work Advice from an Agony Aunt

We’re just great apes in glasses. Photo by Flickr user Jeff L.

Work is a lot of work. Most of us have to work for about half of our waking hours for about half of our lives. And they’re mostly not easy hours. Work can be full of conflicts, confusion, drama, trauma, and awkwardness. I started writing a work advice column a year ago for Slate to help advice seekers think through their work dilemmas, and to help readers solve their own work problems by reading about other people’s. I’d like to share a few of the themes that have come up, in case they’re useful to you or yours. 

Advice columns have been around since at least 1690, and they’re immensely popular. Carolyn Hax’s advice column is always among the most-read articles on the Washington Post, and many readers who are furious about the publication’s owner, editorial page, and layoffs are keeping their subscriptions only because of Hax. I’ve been reading advice columns since I was a kid and think they’ve helped me avoid a lot of mistakes and be a more considerate and thoughtful person. Fundamentally, they’re lessons in perspective-taking, problem solving, and empathy. 

Each letter to the column—which the editors named “Good Job,” isn’t that great?—describes a specific problem, with plenty of context and details that make the problem tricky. (If it were a simple problem, the person probably wouldn’t be writing in to an advice column.) I try to address the specifics but also extract general principles that might apply to other people’s work questions. A lot of these principles are basic primate stuff about power, communication, and alliances, since we’re just great apes in glasses.

Tell people what you want them to know. Many work problems are communication problems. One person was disappointed that her colleagues didn’t notice her engagement ring, another wanted her husband to stop spending so much time with his boss. (Most of these links go to full columns, which have three questions each and are behind a metered paywall. Some go to Slate Plus content, for subscribers only. Apologies if you can’t access something.) Even people we spend most of our time with don’t notice big or little things we’d like them to; they’re no Sherlocks. Even when you do tell someone something, you may have to tell them again and again. This is especially common in the workplace, which is full of distractions and corporate-speak and mixed messages. 

Continue reading

Lunch with a Jumping Spider

Frieda (Phidippus johnsoni). Betsy Mason

I think about jumping spiders a lot. If you have had a conversation with me in the last several years that lasted more than 5 minutes, you already know this. But what are the spiders thinking?

A friend once bought me a mug with a spider on it that reads “Sometimes I wonder if jumping spiders are thinking about me too.” The spider has a little thought bubble that says “Betsy.” I literally wonder this very thing, nearly every day. I may never know for sure, but I recently got a little closer to the answer, thanks to a clever new study. 

As I wrote in a previous post, I recognize individual jumping spiders in my neighborhood based on where they hang out, how they look, and most importantly, how they behave. On my daily dog walks, I’ll often see the same spider on the same succulent for days and even weeks. 

Some are consistently curious and will let me get very close and take lots of photos. Some like to jump on my phone or my hand if I offer a slightly higher perch. (Before they jump, they stretch their front two legs out toward their destination for a second or two, like a toddler asking to be picked up. It’s adorable.) Other spiders are quite timid, ducking behind a leaf the moment they see me coming and remaining hidden as long as I’m there. 

A lot of jumping spiders will let me approach if I am careful, but hide if I move too quickly, or get too close, or stick around too long. It’s as if they are curious, but lose their nerve. It’s these spiders who make me wonder if they might eventually recognize me like I recognize them. There’s one such spider currently living on an aeonium around the corner from my house, a young Phiddipus johnsoni I call Frieda. Could she come to know I’m not a threat? Could we become friends?

Continue reading

Redux: The Once Soft World

This originally posted on LWON back in 2022.

I took this picture the other day, and it’s a trick. For half a second, I thought I’d made some impossible discovery, the track of what looks to be a giant cat in ancient sandstone.

With all the prehistoric tracks appearing lately — Ice Age humans in Utah, sloths in New Mexico, dinosaurs in Texas — I’ve had my eye to the ground. The picture I took is of Jurassic sandstone. It resembles a cat track, the size of a Pleistocene species, a 500-700 pound feline. Rounded pads, no claw marks, that’s what I’d call it. But felines are Oligocene in origin, 25 million years ago, certainly not Jurassic, which would have been of dinosaur age. So, what is it?

Continue reading

Snapshots

My wife and I have an ongoing debate about whether I take too many photos. Or, more to the point, whether I keep too many of the photos I take. The matter has come to a head lately because our photo account just filled to 89% capacity. We get warnings all the time now. I tentatively offered that we could simply pay a little bit more to double our storage, but she rejected that on principle, arguing it was too much in keeping with a general ethic of endless, heedless expansion. “How many f—–g pictures of the same thing do you need?” she said. “Before we even think about getting more storage, you should go through and really decide what’s worth keeping.”

Our debate was on my mind a couple of weeks ago as my daughter B. and I set out on the Hummocks trail near Mount St. Helens. My wife was out of town visiting friends for the holiday weekend, and I had thought it would be a good time for B. and me to do a little winter camping. B., as might be expected, wasn’t terribly enthused at the prospect, but she came gamely along. Not that I gave her much choice.

Continue reading

I Have a Cold

This first ran in February 18, 2019, back when we thought colds came and went, big deal. Since then, covid has brought us to Jesus and back again, and people are having colds again, not exactly a big deal, not exactly not. And lest this post about our bodies’ resilience be taken as support for not getting vaccines, it’s not, it’s decidedly not. If I hadn’t had a that year’s shot, I’d have been a lot sicker for a lot longer. Anyway, I present this with sympathy for all today’s people with colds: you’re not alone.

I’m writing this to be the voice of all the people who have had this winter’s ratty cold and have not written blog posts about it.   I’ve had it twice now, so aside from worrying about what that says about my fundamentals, I feel qualified to testify.  I testified once before here but this time I’m serious.

Day 1:  Scratchy sore throat, I had this three months ago, I am instantly on guard.  I take no chances. I decline an invitation to come over for drinks. I take a pre-emptive antihistamine,

Day 2:  Scratchier sore throat, possible increase in fatigue.  I would decline drinks again but receive no invitations. I take another pre-emptive antihistamine, add an anti-inflammatory nasal spray, sleep badly.

Day 3:  Continued as before, wondering whether a cold that takes this long to kick in means I’m beating it or it’s going to be a bitch.  I bundle up and go the farmers’ market for the week’s food.  Sleep interrupted by coughing and nose blowing.

Day 4.  Scratchy sore throat turns vicious, coughing painful.  A cold virus, I think. I remember my husband telling me about a long-ago relative whose doctor told her she had a virus and viruses can’t be cured, so she went home, told her family she had an incurable virus, and took to her bed for seven years.  I think the story was true.  

Day 5:  Swallowing feels like knives in my throat.  I sit on the couch under a fuzzy blanket, humidifier going.  Antihistamines now accompannied by NSAIDs, nasal spray regimine changes to the real thing, antihistamines.  Reflect that, in spite of the antihistamines, the histamines are still winning.  Reflect further that I don’t know what histamines are. 

I google. All I can figure out is what I think is happening: Somewhere around a week ago, a rhinovirus and all its friends got up my nose, where they latched on to epithelial cells which became all alarmed and disrupted and leaky and broadcast immune system signals which resulted in everything getting inflamed.  Somehow the result of all this was poison mucus (I’m flatout making up the poison) (but surely something has to be irritating the hell out of everything, maybe that’s the histamines?). Somehow the inflaming mucal process moved into my sinuses (“Gwaltney et al reported that the intranasal pressure created by nose blowing, sneezing, and coughing is great enough to propel nasal secretions into the sinuses.”) (Lord, have mercy). And then the secretions moved gravitationally back out my nose and down my throat and into my bronchiae and lungs.  The reason for coughing seems intuitively obvious (Bronchiae: “Get it outa here and now!”) but apparently is not:  “Unfortunately, the mechanism of infectious cough brought on by . . . human rhinovirus, during colds, remains elusive despite the extensive work that has been undertaken.”  I still don’t know what histamines are but I no longer care.

Day 6:  Alarmed by the throat knives getting worse, and by Cassie’s social media post that her sore throat turned out to be not viral but strep, and by the Capital Weather Gang getting torqued up about a snowstorm followed by extreme cold (meaning that the usual Baltimore approach to snow, letting it melt, won’t work), I go to the ER.  The ER is kind but bored: not strep, not the flu, here’s some nice anti-coughing meds and a nice over-the-counter palliative, go home and take plenty of fluid.  The ER adds the word “acute” to the diagnosis of “upper respiratory infection” which makes me feel important until I remember that to doctors, “acute” means only “not chronic.” The ER says in parting that the cold is about to get better on its own.  I go home to my couch, surrounded now by cups of honeyed tea, pharmaceuticals, and used kleenex. 

Day 6:  The snow turned out to be slight and the sun strong enough that the usual Baltimore snow removal strategy is indeed working.  Under the influence of pharmaceuticals, I’ve had 10 hours of sleep.  Knives drastically dulled, coughing decreased, far fewer kleenexes.  Sunlight is pouring through the windows and puddling up on the floor.  It’s all I can do to not lie down in one of those puddles, but my stern midwestern breeding disallows such indulgence and I’m back on the couch, watching the sun outline the clouds of humidifier vapor and backlight the tips of the used kleenex. I’m about to be cured, I think. 

Then I think what that doctor should have told my husband’s relative:  doctors can’t cure viruses, but bodies can.  That’s not quite true about doctors any more: antivirals are excellent against hepatitis, herpes, HIV.  But the common-cold is caused by a rhinovirus, and less frequently by a list of evil-sounding viruses, a couple of which are only recently discovered, and all of which cause similar symptoms, can occasionally get serious, and are cured only by bodies. 

Day 7:  I’m still on my couch, throat nearly normal, still hacking, tire easily.  But I’m getting cured! I have an incurable virus but my body is curing it! 

Day 8: I figure out what this post is really about: not just whining about the common cold, but the enormous number of things, physical and mental, that break in the body that the body can’t fix.  I’m not listing them because we all know them already, these things for which no medical or psychological measures work. But when the body doesn’t even need the doctors and scientists and therapists, when it just goes about doing what it knows how to do, its little cells and enzymes and proteins trudging dutifully through their routines, and WHAM! curing happens, then honest to God, I turn my face gratefully to the glow of a miracle.

Photo: simpleinsomnia  slightly cropped, via Flickr

4 thoughts on “I Have a Cold”

  1.  Dr D says: EditAwesome post. Just ending my first week with honest-to-god Influenza. Thankfully I had the flu shot so it’s attenuated. That means I only felt like I was dying for a few days instead of the full week. And now, thanks to the flu’s beatdown on my immune system, I have picked up that damn throat thing you describe here. Sigh. C’mon body. Hurry up and heal. The weather is fine outside and I’m missing it!
  2.  Man Flu says: EditCheered me up no end (I’m at day three!), here’s to day eight and onwards, there is an end! I don’t think I have the wherewithal currently to document it daily as my mind is like a proverbial London pea-souper at the moment. Thanks for letting me know whats coming and when it going to be going.
  3. Kaleberg says:EditWow! That was a quick cold. It’s usually two weeks coming, two weeks with me and two weeks going. That is, unless it’s worse. Right now on day 32 of whatever kind of cold I have.
    1.  Ann Finkbeiner says: EditI ended the post with the day I knew I was going to live. But yes, I’m still dealing with it and I don’t even know how long it’s been.

Why I’m so excited about the weight loss drugs I’ll never take

a girl in a 1920s poster peruses a selection of delicious confectionary

Last year, for the first time, food consumption went down, reported the Financial Times, making 2025 “the first year on record where the volume of food consumed in America has decreased.” The weight loss drugs are taking their pound of flesh: not just from their own delighted customers, but from the food industry too.

Meanwhile, this week I have a story in the New York Times about the way intermittent fasting has been oversold the past decade. One researcher reckons that part of the reason people are finally starting to acknowledge the gap between the big claims for it and the meagre scientific evidence is because of the staggering success of those GLP-1 weight-loss drugs. Against their blindingly undeniable successes, all diets pale.

Most diets don’t work for most people long-term, but there’s a good reason they have been particularly ineffective the past three decades. When you’re up against a food environment that has been engineered to make you helpless to resist, diets don’t stand a chance. Unless they have help, which they now do.

It’s becoming increasingly apparent that the benefits of Wegovy, Ozempic, Mounjaro, and the rest won’t just accrue to the people who take them. If the drugs cause major changes to the food landscape, even those of us who don’t take them will probably become healthier.

Continue reading